Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Windows Time Synchronization - Best Practices
From: Andrew Farmer <andfarm () teknovis com>
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 12:21:53 -0700
On 24 Oct 2004, at 18:48, Gary E. Miller wrote:
On Fri, 22 Oct 2004, Micheal Espinola Jr wrote:You can certainly have multiple time servers specified with Windows Time Service (SNTP). RTM. It has the ability to failover through a list.Yes you can have multiple time servers, but only one active at a time. With NTP your client polls a number of diverse servers. Routes can flap, servers can go wacko, but your time stays solid.
The canonical *NIX ntp client supports multiple active servers, if that's what you're talking about. No idea about Windows, though.
Attachment:
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Current thread:
- RE: Windows Time Synchronization - Best Practices, (continued)
- RE: Windows Time Synchronization - Best Practices Phillip R. Paradis (Oct 21)
- RE: Windows Time Synchronization - Best Practices Todd Towles (Oct 19)
- RE: Windows Time Synchronization - Best Practices Keith Pachulski (Oct 19)
- RE: Windows Time Synchronization - Best Practices Cushing, David (Oct 21)
- RE: Windows Time Synchronization - Best Practices Gary E. Miller (Oct 21)
- RE: Windows Time Synchronization - Best Practices Frank Knobbe (Oct 21)
- Re: Windows Time Synchronization - Best Practices Micheal Espinola Jr (Oct 22)
- Virus/Trojan trying to connect external:445 and 212.175.149.149.6667 Murat Bicer (Oct 22)
- Re: Virus/Trojan trying to connect external:445 and 212.175.149.149.6667 darren windham (Oct 22)
- Re: Windows Time Synchronization - Best Practices Gary E. Miller (Oct 24)
- Re: Windows Time Synchronization - Best Practices Andrew Farmer (Oct 25)
- RE: Windows Time Synchronization - Best Practices Gary E. Miller (Oct 21)
- RE: Windows Time Synchronization - Best Practices joe (Oct 22)
