Full Disclosure mailing list archives
RE: JPEG AV Detection
From: "Bojan Zdrnja" <Bojan.Zdrnja () LSS hr>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 19:45:30 +1200
-----Original Message----- From: full-disclosure-admin () lists netsys com [mailto:full-disclosure-admin () lists netsys com] On Behalf Of Todd Towles Sent: Wednesday, 29 September 2004 7:26 a.m. To: Mailing List - Full-Disclosure Subject: FW: [Full-disclosure] JPEG AV Detection What exactly are the AV products detecting in the JPEG exploits? Barry and I was talking about how impressed we were that the AV companies jumped on this one and detection was pretty fast. But is the detection so generic that a variant will bypass? Is the detection based on a original exploit that could be modified in a way that makes it "undetectable" right now?
If they are any decent then they'll check for incorrect values in comment size fields. It's very easy to detect it since value has to be 0 or 1 in order to exploit the vulnerability. A little problem is that comment size field can be in any section of the JPEG, not just at the beginning (as in the original exploit), but I supposed that AV vendors caught this. Cheers, Bojan _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- FW: JPEG AV Detection Todd Towles (Sep 28)
- Re: FW: JPEG AV Detection Gerry Eisenhaur (Sep 28)
- RE: JPEG AV Detection Bojan Zdrnja (Sep 29)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: FW: JPEG AV Detection Aaron Horst (Sep 28)
- RE: FW: JPEG AV Detection Todd Towles (Sep 28)
