Full Disclosure mailing list archives
RE: Windoze almost managed to 200x repeat 9/11
From: Ron DuFresne <dufresne () winternet com>
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 22:24:41 -0500 (CDT)
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004, joe wrote:
Again, there are valid uses of GetTickCount and there are safe ways of doing so. If there is concern, I do recommend testing functionality associated with each of the DLLs. You might find a bug you can report for kudos. On the incident, I would guess the vendor never had a clue it would do that. That function can't return more than 49.7 days without breaking every app that currently uses it. MS can not do that. That is why there is another function to get the info with a different datatype. See my other posts.
What seems to read clearly from your replies to this thread is that either; 1> the code was better done under the original OS, unix 2> considering "how often" you seems to run into this same issue with other coders in the windows realm, windows coders tend to be especially lazy/clueless as compared to coders in other OS' 3> tools to code with in the windows realm are not as developed/functional as they are in other envs 4> M$ does not properly provide developers with clued information with which to do their jobs
From which you can combine any or all of the above for a correct
interpretation of the total of your replies.
Thanks,
Ron DuFresne
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Cutting the space budget really restores my faith in humanity. It
eliminates dreams, goals, and ideals and lets us get straight to the
business of hate, debauchery, and self-annihilation." -- Johnny Hart
***testing, only testing, and damn good at it too!***
OK, so you're a Ph.D. Just don't touch anything.
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- RE: Windoze almost managed to 200x repeat 9/11, (continued)
- RE: Windoze almost managed to 200x repeat 9/11 joe (Sep 24)
- Re: Windoze almost managed to 200x repeat 9/11 Georgi Guninski (Sep 24)
- RE: Windoze almost managed to 200x repeat 9/11 joe (Sep 24)
- RE: Windoze almost managed to 200x repeat 9/11 pingywon MCSE (Sep 24)
- Re: Windoze almost managed to 200x repeat 9/11 Georgi Guninski (Sep 24)
- RE: Windoze almost managed to 200x repeat 9/11 joe (Sep 24)
- Re: Windoze almost managed to 200x repeat 9/11 bashis (Sep 24)
- RE: Windoze almost managed to 200x repeat 9/11 joe (Sep 24)
- Re: Windoze almost managed to 200x repeat 9/11 bashis (Sep 24)
- RE: Windoze almost managed to 200x repeat 9/11 joe (Sep 24)
- RE: Windoze almost managed to 200x repeat 9/11 Ron DuFresne (Sep 24)
- Re: Windoze almost managed to 200x repeat 9/11 James Tucker (Sep 25)
- Re: Windoze almost managed to 200x repeat 9/11 Ron DuFresne (Sep 25)
- RE: Windoze almost managed to 200x repeat 9/11 joe (Sep 25)
- Re: Windoze almost managed to 200x repeat 9/11 devis (Sep 25)
- RE: Windoze almost managed to 200x repeat 9/11 joe (Sep 26)
- Re: Windoze almost managed to 200x repeat 9/11 Georgi Guninski (Sep 28)
- RE: Windoze almost managed to 200x repeat 9/11 joe (Sep 24)
- Re: Windoze almost managed to 200x repeat 9/11 Troy (Sep 25)
- RE: Windoze almost managed to 200x repeat 9/11 Ron DuFresne (Sep 25)
- Re: Windoze almost managed to 200x repeat 9/11 Barry Fitzgerald (Sep 24)
- Re: Windoze almost managed to 200x repeat 9/11 Frank Knobbe (Sep 24)
