Full Disclosure mailing list archives
RE: Moderated lists
From: gwood () dragonhold org
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 12:09:26 -0000 (GMT)
What about a entirely separate Full-Disclosure-Admins list?
Quite apart from the fact that the guy in charge of the list has already said that this is not going to happen, and that any further discussion on this point is irrelevant - you're still not actually gaining anything. I would have thought that for most of the people on this list, getting an extra email address is going to take about 30 seconds - and that's if they type slowly. I've got domains with '*@' going to me - so for me it's just a case of registering from it and everything is done. So your 'admin' list is merely going to be full of discussions about whether x () example com is the same as y () example com, and therefore should they be banned? And then z () example com gets created. And what have you gained? People that the majority of the list find irritating have to spend an extra 30 seconds every couple of days to keep posting - and the 'admin' waste hours every week keeping on top of it. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Re: Moderated lists, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: Moderated lists Joe Average (Dec 15)
- RE: Moderated lists Aditya Deshmukh (Dec 15)
- Re: Moderated lists (NO) ad () heapoverflow com (Dec 16)
- RE: Moderated lists Todd Towles (Dec 15)
- Re: Moderated lists bkfsec (Dec 15)
- RE: Moderated lists Randall M (Dec 16)
- RE: Moderated lists FullDis . 20 . mandoskippy (Dec 15)
- Re: Moderated lists Dave Korn (Dec 16)
- RE: Moderated lists Xyberpix (Dec 16)
- RE: Moderated lists Xyberpix (Dec 16)
- RE: Moderated lists gwood (Dec 16)
