Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: New Internet Explorer Beta
From: Anders Breindahl <skrewz () skrewz dk>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 02:02:11 +0100
Yes, I did notice that too. I find it somewhat odd, that the browser is not secure in itself. It seems, that in Microsoft's point of view, security needs to be something complex and patchy. No such simple solution as simply upgrading software to a version which is not vulnerable. I don't get it. Isn't this whole requirement of a third-party antivirus suite, firewall and spyware-remover a big mess and a waste of resources? Regards, Anders Breindahl. On Wednesday 16 February 2005 01:26, Stan Bubrouski wrote:
On a related topic Microsoft's whole Anti-Spyware suite running on top of a new IE just to plug holes? How much memory is wasted when you could simply run firefox or another browser and have no need to run either of those two hogs. -sb
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- New Internet Explorer Beta danjr (Feb 15)
- Re: New Internet Explorer Beta Stan Bubrouski (Feb 15)
- RE: New Internet Explorer Beta William Lefkovics (Feb 15)
- Re: New Internet Explorer Beta Xavier Beaudouin (Feb 16)
- Re: New Internet Explorer Beta dk (Feb 16)
- Re: New Internet Explorer Beta Anders Breindahl (Feb 17)
- RE: New Internet Explorer Beta William Lefkovics (Feb 15)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: New Internet Explorer Beta Robert Moss (Feb 16)
- Re: New Internet Explorer Beta Stan Bubrouski (Feb 15)
