Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: Our Industry Is Seriously Ethics Impaired


From: "J.A. Terranson" <measl () mfn org>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 09:03:34 -0500 (CDT)


On Wed, 27 Jul 2005, Adam Jones wrote:

What exactly is wrong with this? I personally would rather have 3com
buying up exploits (probably under an agreement for exclusive access)
instead of having them sold to the highest, probably malicious,
bidder.

Your argument amounts to "The lesser of two evils", which is NOT the same
as ethical behaviour.

Even if someone sells it to both there is a more reputable
group that has the exploit and can help with mitigation.

"Reputable"?  I'm sorry, we must have different opinions as to what
constitutes "reputable".  A "reputable" company does not encourage the
writing of malware for money, or the withholding of information from the
community (FD) in exchange for mere personal gain.

-- 
Yours,

J.A. Terranson
sysadmin () mfn org
0xBD4A95BF


"A stock broker is someone who handles your money until its all gone."
Diana Hubbard (of Scientology fame)
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/


Current thread: