Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Blocking Skype
From: Polarizer <Polarizer () Codixx Com>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 14:53:57 +0100
No, the "connect" was certainly not a typo. But indeed the "http access" was.
The 2nd typo was "numerics_IPs" instead of "numeric_IPs". I think, it is o.k. to show up such pitfalls.
> BTW: I'm sure, it will break a lot of other things but skype, too.Do you mean "I'm sure it will break a lot of other things, but skype too.", or "I'm sure it will break a lot of other things but skype."? I guess we all mak typos :>)
I'm not a native speaker/writer. I meant: "I'm sure, it will break a lot of other things, not only skype."
nice day polarizer _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Blocking Skype dsluser (Nov 13)
- RE: Blocking Skype Aditya Deshmukh (Nov 13)
- Re: Blocking Skype Kevin (Nov 14)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Blocking Skype Polarizer (Nov 14)
- Re[2]: Blocking Skype phased (Nov 14)
- Re: Blocking Skype Andrew McGill (Nov 14)
- Re: Blocking Skype Peter van den Heuvel (Nov 14)
- Message not available
- Re: Blocking Skype Polarizer (Nov 14)
- Blocking Skype dsluser (Nov 14)
