Full Disclosure mailing list archives
RE: XCP2 v XCP - more than sony at fault?
From: "Larry Seltzer" <larry () larryseltzer com>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 11:09:42 -0500
Running a restricted user account by default would also help (no admin
privileges given to the application located on the CD).
I recommend everyone to get into this habit when using Windows desktops.
In cases in which you need admin privileges to install an application you can just use the command "run as" by right-clicking on the executable to install. Ditto to all of this. It's not just good practice, it specifically stops the XCP software which reports that it (actually, it says that the music player) requires administrator privileges to install. I'm sure most people would just login as admin and install, but at least at that point you're explicitly pointing the gun at your own head and pulling the trigger. Larry Seltzer eWEEK.com Security Center Editor http://security.eweek.com/ http://blog.ziffdavis.com/seltzer Contributing Editor, PC Magazine larryseltzer () ziffdavis com _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- XCP2 v XCP - more than sony at fault? Disco Jonny (Nov 22)
- Re: XCP2 v XCP - more than sony at fault? Michael Holstein (Nov 22)
- Re: XCP2 v XCP - more than sony at fault? pagvac (Nov 22)
- RE: XCP2 v XCP - more than sony at fault? Larry Seltzer (Nov 22)
- Re: XCP2 v XCP - more than sony at fault? bkfsec (Nov 22)
- Re: XCP2 v XCP - more than sony at fault? Disco Jonny (Nov 22)
- Re: XCP2 v XCP - more than sony at fault? pagvac (Nov 22)
- Re: XCP2 v XCP - more than sony at fault? Michael Holstein (Nov 22)
