Full Disclosure mailing list archives
RE: Careless Law Enforcement Computer ForensicsLacking InfoSec Expertise Causes Suicides
From: Paul Schmehl <pauls () utdallas edu>
Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2005 10:59:07 -0500
--On Monday, October 03, 2005 09:38:16 -0400 Lane Weast <lweast () leeclerk org> wrote:
Whenever I read stuff like this on an international list, I always wonder if the people posting understand that the rest of the world doesn't necessarily work the way your little corner of the world works.In theory, what you say is incorrect. They may take you in but, in court they have to prove it was yours. It is not your responsibility to prove your innocence. It is their responsibility to prove your guilt.
For example, French law, which is based upon Napoleonic law, places the burden of proof on the defendant. You are guilty unless you can prove your innocent.
So, your comments almost certainly do not apply to many people reading here. Which causes one to wonder - what value do they have to the audience reading?
Paul Schmehl (pauls () utdallas edu) Adjunct Information Security Officer University of Texas at Dallas AVIEN Founding Member http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- RE: Careless Law Enforcement Computer ForensicsLacking InfoSec Expertise Causes Suicides Lane Weast (Oct 03)
- Re: Careless Law Enforcement Computer ForensicsLacking InfoSec Expertise Causes Suicides Michael Holstein (Oct 03)
- RE: Careless Law Enforcement Computer ForensicsLacking InfoSec Expertise Causes Suicides Paul Schmehl (Oct 03)
- Re: Careless Law Enforcement Computer ForensicsLacking InfoSec Expertise Causes Suicides Steve Kudlak (Oct 03)
- Re: Careless Law Enforcement ComputerForensicsLacking InfoSec Expertise Causes Suicides Greg (Oct 05)
