
Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Re: ZoneAlarm phones home
From: "Dave Korn" <davek_throwaway () hotmail com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 19:39:22 -0000
Ivan . wrote:
Without seeing the content of these packets, I don't see how Cringely can claim to know whether there's anything spyware or not about it.It should be up to zonealarm to prove that it isn't spyware, don't you think?
Have you stopped beating your wife yet? (It should be up to *you* to _prove_ that you don't beat her, don't you think?) Once you've done that, prove you've stopped beating your dad too. Then prove you no longer molest penguins in dark alleyways late at night. BTW, can you prove you aren't a thief?
Shouldn't they do everything they can to alley the fears of their customers?
No. I don't believe there is a duty on anyone to respond to the fabrications and fantasies of liars, kooks and delusional confabulators. These people are making massive claims with zero evidence. The burden of proof lies on the accuser. cheers, DaveK -- Can't think of a witty .sigline today.... _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- ZoneAlarm phones home Ivan . (Jan 23)
- Re: ZoneAlarm phones home Dave Korn (Jan 26)
- Re: Re: ZoneAlarm phones home Ivan . (Jan 26)
- Re: Re: ZoneAlarm phones home Dave Korn (Jan 27)
- Re: Re: Re: ZoneAlarm phones home Ivan . (Jan 27)
- Re: Re: ZoneAlarm phones home Ivan . (Jan 26)
- Re: ZoneAlarm phones home Dave Korn (Jan 26)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: ZoneAlarm phones home Zone Labs Security Team (Jan 28)