
Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Unofficial Microsoft patches help hackers, not security
From: Simon Richter <Simon.Richter () hogyros de>
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2006 20:47:32 +0100
Hello, Joe Average schrieb:
It has been said on C|NET/SecurityFocus and other places that "experts" are telling people to use unofficial patches, and to make things worse the "experts" are releasing patches.
I agree that unofficial Windows patches are a bad thing, but not for the reasons you mention. My primary concerns would be that it changes the gut feeling people have upon receiving mail telling them to install patches from "this might be fishy" to "it worked last time, so why not try it". I.e. it helps those who take the social engineering vector. Simon _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Re: Unofficial Microsoft patches help hackers, not security, (continued)
- Re: Unofficial Microsoft patches help hackers, not security Joe Average (Jan 04)
- Re: Unofficial Microsoft patches help hackers, not security Niek (Jan 04)
- Re: Unofficial Microsoft patches help hackers, not security gboyce (Jan 04)
- Re: Unofficial Microsoft patches help hackers, not security Dan Trevino (Jan 04)
- Re: Unofficial Microsoft patches help hackers, not security Morning Wood (Jan 04)
- Re: Unofficial Microsoft patches help hackers, not security ad () heapoverflow com (Jan 04)
- Re: Unofficial Microsoft patches help hackers, not security Morning Wood (Jan 04)
- Re: Unofficial Microsoft patches help hackers, not security bkfsec (Jan 05)
- Re: Unofficial Microsoft patches help hackers, not security Joe Average (Jan 04)
- Re: Unofficial Microsoft patches help hackers, not security Colin (Jan 05)
- Re: Unofficial Microsoft patches help hackers, not security Michael Holstein (Jan 04)