
Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Re: blocking tor is not the right way forward. It may just be the right way backward.
From: "Mike Owen" <kyphros () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 10:33:32 -0700
On 6/9/06, Cardoso <cardosolistas () contraditorium com> wrote:
Most websites rely on cookies, sessions and javascript. If a user can't live with that, I'm very sorry but there's nothing I can do.
Actually, no, most websites don't. I use a deny by default cookie policy, and NoScript, and nearly every single website I visit works. I need to enable session cookies when I'm buying something online, but JavaScript is rare that I ever need to enable it for a site.
Same about corporate networks where people way high on the food chain demand full access, no firewall control or even transparent filtering.
If you have that kind of problem where you work, you need to work on more education and security awareness. Where I am, we force all outbound traffic through a proxy, and everyone including the oh so precious C level goes through it. Mike _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Re: Re: blocking tor is not the right way forward. It may just be the right way backward., (continued)
- Re: Re: blocking tor is not the right way forward. It may just be the right way backward. Joel Jose (Jun 08)
- Re: Re: blocking tor is not the right way forward. It may just be the right way backward. John Sprocket (Jun 09)
- Re: Re: blocking tor is not the right way forward. It may just be the right way backward. Michael Holstein (Jun 09)
- Re: Re: blocking tor is not the right way forward. It may just be the right way backward. Rodrigo Barbosa (Jun 09)
- Re: Re: blocking tor is not the right way forward. It may just be the right way backward. Michael Holstein (Jun 09)
- Re: Re: blocking tor is not the right way forward. It may just be the right way backward. Micheal Espinola Jr (Jun 09)
- Re: Re: blocking tor is not the right way forward. It may just be the right way backward. Michael Holstein (Jun 09)
- Re: Re: blocking tor is not the right way forward. It may just be the right way backward. Micheal Espinola Jr (Jun 09)
- Re: Re: blocking tor is not the right way forward. It may just be the right way backward. Rodrigo Barbosa (Jun 09)
- Re: Re: blocking tor is not the right way forward. It may just be the right way backward. Cardoso (Jun 09)
- Re: Re: blocking tor is not the right way forward. It may just be the right way backward. Mike Owen (Jun 09)
- Re: Re: blocking tor is not the right way forward. It may just be the right way backward. Ducki3 (Jun 09)
- Re: Re: blocking tor is not the right way forward. It may just be the right way backward. Jeffrey F. Bloss (Jun 09)
- Re: Re: blocking tor is not the right way forward. It may just be the right way backward. Eliah Kagan (Jun 10)
- Re: Re: blocking tor is not the right way forward. It may just be the right way backward. Eliah Kagan (Jun 10)
- Re: Re: blocking tor is not the right way forward. It may just be the right way backward. Rodrigo Barbosa (Jun 10)
- Re: Re: blocking tor is not the right way forward. It may just be the right way backward. Eliah Kagan (Jun 10)