 
Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Re: Will the spammer please stop!
From: "Eliah Kagan" <degeneracypressure () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 18:49:00 -0800
On 6/22/06, Randal T. Rioux wrote:
The words "best solution" should NEVER be used in the same sentence as "sender verification," unless "not" separates them. It is obnoxious and places the burden of your lack of effort or knowledge onto the sender.
I second this. In addition to being obnoxious, implementing sender verification on FD will prevent FD subscribers from receiving legitimate advisories and information sent by people who are justifiably unwilling to cooperate with sender verification. I would suggest that making a significant avenue of full disclosure (the FD list) more difficult to use by treating people who submit advisories like Microsoft treats people who activate Windows over the phone (i.e. by assuming they are miscreants) does not encourage full disclosure, and is consequently unsuitable for this list. -Eliah _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Will the spammer please stop! Dan B (Jun 22)
- Message not available- Re: Will the spammer please stop! Dan B (Jun 22)
- Re: Re: Will the spammer please stop! <...> (Jun 22)
- Re: Re: Will the spammer please stop! Karol Wiesek (Jun 22)
- Re: Re: Will the spammer please stop! Dan B (Jun 22)
- Re: Re: Will the spammer please stop! Randal T. Rioux (Jun 22)
- Re: Re: Will the spammer please stop! Eliah Kagan (Jun 22)
- Re: Re: Will the spammer please stop! Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 22)
- Re: Re: Will the spammer please stop! Cardoso (Jun 22)
 
- Re: Re: Will the spammer please stop! Eric Ericson (Jun 22)
 
- Re: Will the spammer please stop! Dan B (Jun 22)
 
- Message not available


