
Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: AFS - The Ultimate Sulution?
From: Denis Jedig <seclists () syneticon de>
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 16:48:49 +0200
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 23:00:46 +0200 Paul Sebastian Ziegler wrote:
It seems like this system is quite secure. Even if an attacker should gain root-access locally he would not be able to access anything he didn't own in the first place.
This approach completly ignores shared "workgroup" storages which are quite commonplace in any business environment. Not only could a malicious user spoil up the (usually rather expensive) data on the storage, he could alter data files to exploit vulnerabilities in client software to get controlling access to user contexts with more / different access permissions. So it is indeed quite important to keep the client OS and applications up to date, regardless of the immutability of those components by the single user. -- Denis Jedig syneticon networks GbR http://syneticon.net/service/ _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- AFS - The Ultimate Sulution? Paul Sebastian Ziegler (Sep 14)
- Re: AFS - The Ultimate Sulution? Denis Jedig (Sep 17)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: AFS - The Ultimate Sulution? マグロ原子 (Sep 20)
- Re: AFS - The Ultimate Sulution? Paul Sebastian Ziegler (Sep 20)
- Re: AFS - The Ultimate Sulution? Siim Põder (Sep 20)
- Re: AFS - The Ultimate Sulution? Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 20)
- Re: AFS - The Ultimate Sulution? Brian Eaton (Sep 20)
- Re: AFS - The Ultimate Sulution? Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 20)
- Re: AFS - The Ultimate Sulution? Paul Sebastian Ziegler (Sep 20)