Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Professional IT Security Service Providers - Exposed
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2007 18:02:50 -0500
On Tue, 04 Dec 2007 16:02:26 EST, secreview () hushmail com said:
"Generally our reviews are done by reading the contents of the
companies website. We strip away all the marketing fluff and we
look for untruths, poor grammar, quality of service, team talent
and capabilities, site clarity, etc. If the website leaves us with
questions, or sounds too good to be true we call the security
company being reviewed and engage them in conversation about their
capabilities and offerings."
You'll notice that the above is an exact quote and not some altered
version of what was said taken out of context by someone ("trains")
trying to sound smart.
So you take *their* contents and strip marketing fluff, but you don't like it when somebody else does the same thing to your text?
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Professional IT Security Service Providers - Exposed secreview (Dec 04)
- Re: Professional IT Security Service Providers - Exposed trains (Dec 04)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Professional IT Security Service Providers - Exposed secreview (Dec 04)
- Re: Professional IT Security Service Providers - Exposed Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 05)
- Re: Professional IT Security Service Providers - Exposed Dude VanWinkle (Dec 05)
- Re: Professional IT Security Service Providers - Exposed Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 05)
- Re: Professional IT Security Service Providers - Exposed SecReview (Dec 05)
