Re: [Professional IT Security Providers - Exposed] Cybertrust ( C + )

["Fredrick Diggle" <fdiggle () gmail com>]

The evil .gov are gonna subpoena hushmail for his identity because he
told the sec review guy things about a company no one cares about...
Oh noes!

On Dec 20, 2007 6:32 PM, coderman <coderman () gmail com> wrote:
> On Dec 20, 2007 4:06 PM, Dude VanWinkle <dudevanwinkle () gmail com> wrote:
> > ...
> > WTF are you taking about Don? Of course hushmail is completely anonymous !
> >
> > http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2007/11/pgp-creator-def.html
>
> that shit makes me laugh so hard...
>
> transitive trust in some singular unknown *business* entity, whose
> motives and reasoning center around *profit* and not loyalty, is
> foolishness in spades.
>
> anonymity requires large scale decentralized participation.  anything
> else is just imitating...
>
> [i'd like to delve into a detailed discussion of privacy and/or
> anonymity, and the difference between them, but this hard copy of the
> latest SecReview just printed and awaits my frottage... OH YESZ]
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/