Re: [Professional IT Security Reviewers - Exposed] SecReview ( A + )

["Nate McFeters" <nate.mcfeters () gmail com>]

Unless I missed something, these seemed like legitimate responses.  They may
not have all been delivered with tact, but I mean, you are on FD, what did
you expect?

I think some valid points are brought up about your credentials and your
process.

Nate


On 12/21/07, SecReview <secreview () hushmail com> wrote:
> PaulM:
>
> You'd be right only if you weren't wrong. That being said, we're
> not going to talk to the trolls any more. While it might be amusing
> it's a waste of our time, and our readers time.
>
> We will continue to write reviews and will continue to be as honest
> and truthful as possible during our reviews. Likewise, if any of
> our legitimate readers have any questions or comments about our
> blog, we'd very much appreciate them. We especially want people to
> comment if they have worked with a vendor that we have assessed, we
> want to know your experience. Other than that, thanks for your time
> and thanks for reading!
>
>
>
> On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 07:00:40 -0500 Paul Melson <pmelson () gmail com>
> wrote:
> > On Dec 20, 2007 7:19 PM, SecReview <secreview () hushmail com> wrote:
> > > > 1.) What are your qualifications for reviewing these
> > companies?
> > > We are a team of security professionals that have been
> > performing a
> > > wide array of penetration tests, vulnerability assessments, web
> > > application security services etc. One of our team members has
> > > founded two different security companies both of which have been
> > > very successful and have offered high quality services. Yes we
> > have
> > > all sorts of pretty little certifications, but those don't
> > really
> > > matter.
> >
> > So this is basically a tacit admission that every one of your
> > "team"
> > has something to gain by smearing the competition.  At this point,
> > I'm
> > inclined to believe that the firms you've scored favorably are
> > your
> > employers.  You're not only incompetent, it seems that you're
> > unethical as well.  Not that I'm surprised.
> >
> > PaulM
> Regards,
>      The Secreview Team
>      http://secreview.blogspot.com
>
> --
> Click for free information on accounting careers, $150 hour potential.
>
> http://tagline.hushmail.com/fc/Ioyw6h4dCaRmEr952Q9rDz2W8lHgc6veIDv3aadT6aNuLUwzQUCOfu/
>      Professional IT Security Service Providers - Exposed
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/