Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Is OWASP vulnerable ??
From: Andrew Farmer <andfarm () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 13:03:13 -0800
On 10 Mar 07, at 09:23, Scarlet Pimpernel wrote:
Hello all, There is an undefined function in OWASP website's javascript code (wikibits.js) called wgBreakFrames. This can cause potential damage to the site if used maliciously.
...
if (wgBreakFrames) {
... First of all, that's a variable, not a function. Creating a function called "wgBreakFrames" wouldn't execute the function. Second of all, I'm not really sure how that could be "used maliciously". If you're able to inject Javascript into the window context, you can already do whatever you like to the user's browser. So I'm not quite sure how this is supposed to "cause potential damage to the site". _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Is OWASP vulnerable ?? Scarlet Pimpernel (Mar 10)
- Re: Is OWASP vulnerable ?? jf (Mar 10)
- Re: Is OWASP vulnerable ?? Paul Schmehl (Mar 10)
- Re: Is OWASP vulnerable ?? Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 10)
- Re: Is OWASP vulnerable ?? Paul Schmehl (Mar 10)
- Re: Is OWASP vulnerable ?? Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 10)
- Re: Is OWASP vulnerable ?? Paul Schmehl (Mar 10)
- Re: Is OWASP vulnerable ?? jf (Mar 10)
- Re: Is OWASP vulnerable ?? czino2 (Mar 11)
- Re: Is OWASP vulnerable ?? Michael Silk (Mar 11)
- Re: Is OWASP vulnerable ?? Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 10)
- Re: Is OWASP vulnerable ?? Scarlet Pimpernel (Mar 10)
- Re: Is OWASP vulnerable ?? jf (Mar 10)
- Re: Is OWASP vulnerable ?? czino2 (Mar 11)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Is OWASP vulnerable ?? Steven M. Christey (Mar 12)
