Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: Linux big bang theory....


From: scott <redhowlingwolves () bellsouth net>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 01:06:42 -0400

scott wrote:
Just1n T1mberlake wrote:
I know this might be a bit hard for you to understand, but it is 
these 'features' that make OS X impossible to break.
I am guessing if you had your micro$oft operating system or even 
something like n00buntu you will have something to worry about. All 
of these extra 'features' are just making your security harder. Is it 
any wonder there are so many of these advisories every single day? 
How many for OS X?

Maybe instead of flaming you might want to do a security course :-P

just1n

-- 
"Losers make promises they often break. Winners make commitments they 
always keep." - Denis Waitley

Mac OS X Evangelist
Public Relations of NeXus

 
----- Original Message -----
From: "Andrew Farmer" <andfarm () gmail com>
To: "Just1n T1mberlake" <hotpackets () hellokitty com>
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Linux big bang theory....
Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 19:49:37 -0700


On 13 May 07, at 17:47, Just1n T1mberlake wrote:
   
Confirmed Macosx is not vulnerable to this.
      
Well, yeah. The script depends on lynx and wget being available, 
and  neither is installed on OS X. It also depends on the 
line-by-line  layout of several include files, one of which 
(linux/wireless.h)  doesn't even exist on non-Linux systems.

It won't even work on all Linux systems. If the target doesn't have 
  compilers available, for example, it won't have any headers to 
grab  the target strings from.
    

 

  
Evidently you need more experience in security research:
http://projects.info-pull.com/moab/
I believe this should dispel your myth about OSX's invulnerability.

Really...did you honestly believe it was invincible?

Regards


_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/


Current thread: