
Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: 0-day PDF exploit
From: <full-disclosure () mac hush com>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 14:01:05 -0400
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 They are just covering their asses in case someone figures out a scenario where this bug is actually useful, and tries going on a media whoring campaign talking about how evil Adobe is for not originally rating the vulnerability higher. You bunch of whiny, prissy homo fucks. On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 11:26:15 -0400 Justin Klein Keane <jukeane () sas upenn edu> wrote:
Adobe has a work around (but doesn't seem to have a fix yet) for this vulnerability (which they categorize as "critical"). They also state (and testing seems to validate) that impact is limited to Windows XP machines with IE 7. http://www.adobe.com/support/security/advisories/apsa07-04.html Justin C. Klein Keane Sr. Programmer Analyst and Information Security Specialist University of Pennsylvania School of Arts and Sciences Computing 3600 Market St. Philadelphia, PA 19104 eric () rachner us wrote:Why everybody said it is a zero day about PDF? it's just afault inIE7, or just want to make a big media hit? real PDF zero daywillexists in the PDF's file format, or some Adobe's expandedfunctions.Actually, it's about PDF *and* IE7. Both are at fault, and ifeitherone of them was doing the right thing, the exploit would fail. The first fault is Adobe's. Because it's their code that firstacquires the input from the attacker, it's their job IMHO tovalidateit properly, but they don't. Instead, they turn around and tellWindows to open the bogus URI. The second fault is IE7's. The protocol handler used to fail gracefully by rejecting this kind of malformed URI, but now it doesn't. The new behavior is to turn around and callShellExecute()with data taken from the URI. I prefer to think of it this way: Adobe's code has been doingthewrong thing for years, and they've gotten lucky. But now, a newbugin IE7 has come along which makes the old bug in Adobe's code exploitable. - Eric _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Note: This signature can be verified at https://www.hushtools.com/verify Charset: UTF8 Version: Hush 2.5 wpwEAQECAAYFAkcWTeEACgkQqTTbVuUWvbL7LgP/b8ib2UBMcPrOyi3cVtFtveVObHlP p1h19e9S1b4AX8POCp/C1+ZnoqIv51iAEgAQVAaRTewpk/JDuDMq2D34+qGQis5l3Tvv Nm37F96N3WTZ8B20CFMLAnumQXwVHaXo4u3pbpgEW3C6oYApd8uYqG/PuBYn5LzTQNqt g8VyM/g= =oTlt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Re: 0-day PDF exploit, (continued)
- Re: 0-day PDF exploit biz4rre (Oct 16)
- Re: 0-day PDF exploit cocoruder . (Oct 16)
- Re: 0-day PDF exploit eric (Oct 17)
- Re: 0-day PDF exploit Justin Klein Keane (Oct 17)
- Re: 0-day PDF exploit cocoruder . (Oct 17)
- Re: 0-day PDF exploit eric (Oct 17)
- Re: 0-day PDF exploit gboyce (Oct 19)
- 0-day PDF exploit biz4rre (Oct 16)
- Re: 0-day PDF exploit full-disclosure (Oct 16)
- Re: 0-day PDF exploit full-disclosure (Oct 16)
- Re: 0-day PDF exploit full-disclosure (Oct 16)
- Re: 0-day PDF exploit full-disclosure (Oct 17)