Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: Gustav, domain name reportage


From: n3td3v <xploitable () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 03:38:04 +0100

On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 2:57 AM, n3td3v <xploitable () gmail com> wrote:
http://linuxbox.org/pipermail/funsec/2008-August/018318.html
http://isc.sans.org/diary.html?storyid=4954

Hi,

I think its wrong for you to name and shame these domain names, and
specify places people live (funsec), seeing as these folks have done
nothing wrong.

Guilty until proven innocent, is that how it works in cyber security land?

Completely out of order...

All the best,

n3td3v

--
computer security protection news alert system, keep messages short
for cellular devices.
https://groups.google.com/group/n3td3v


 * Now talking in #n3td3v
[03:11] <cybersecure> [Full-disclosure] Gustav, domain name reportage
[03:11] <cybersecure>
http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2008-August/064132.html
[03:15] <ChrisAM> I don't get your post.
[03:16] <ChrisAM> the past disasters demonstrate the abuse of domains like this.
[03:16] <cybersecure> yet those domains are only parked domains just now
[03:16] <cybersecure> no law broken
[03:17] <ChrisAM> dshield is just being proactive.
[03:17] <cybersecure> it could even be the government or a security
company etc buying the domains so they can't be bought
[03:17] <ChrisAM> that's what I suggested earlier to do.
[03:18] <cybersecure> so why name and shame and then the funsec post
starts posting where people live
[03:18] <cybersecure> completely outragous when technically nothing
has been done wrong (yet)
[03:18] <ChrisAM> they just put cities.. not people's names.
[03:19] <cybersecure> its bad enough
[03:19] <ChrisAM> the scumbags are just waiting for the storm to hit.
[03:19] <cybersecure> even you're calling them scumbags before you
even know the reason for the domains
[03:19] <ChrisAM> What other reason would there be?
[03:19] <cybersecure> technically you shouldn't do it until something
has been commited
[03:20] <ChrisAM> Innocent until proven guilty only applies in
law/courts. I can call them whatever I want.
[03:20] <cybersecure> and then i call you a twat
[03:20] <cybersecure> sorry
[03:20] <cybersecure> its not very professional
[03:21] <cybersecure> to name and shame before an fofence has been commited
[03:21] <ChrisAM> You actually think these will be legitimate sites?
[03:21] <cybersecure> offence*
[03:21] <cybersecure> its not for me or anyone else to judge until
something actually happens, and certainly not put on a high profile
sans diary
[03:22] <cybersecure> maybe on backchannels and in private
[03:22] <cybersecure> but not so publically
[03:22] <cybersecure> until an offence is commited
[03:22] <cybersecure> once an offence is commited, shout to the hills about it
[03:23] <ChrisAM> by then 5 million spam mails are already sitting in
people's inboxes.
[03:23] <cybersecure> so you're saying these domains should be cancelled?
[03:23] <ChrisAM> no.
[03:23] <cybersecure> what the fuck!
[03:23] <ChrisAM> I'm saying they should be closely watched.
[03:24] <cybersecure> but not talked about on a sans diary or
published on funsec until something happens
[03:24] <ChrisAM> This is the information gathering phase. It's too
late to start that after the storm hits.
[03:25] <cybersecure> information gather in private until someone does
something wrong
[03:27] <cybersecure> can i put this transcript on f-d?
[03:28] <ChrisAM> ok
[03:28] <ChrisAM> What value will it add there?
[03:28] <cybersecure> you don't care?
[03:30] <cybersecure> brb, i'm going to post...
[03:30] <ChrisAM> no
[03:30] <cybersecure> your nickname will come up on google
[03:30] <ChrisAM> ok
[03:31] <cybersecure> brb then... i'm going to post

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/


Current thread: