Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: [Professional IT Security Providers - Exposed] PlanNetGroup ( F )
From: reepex <reepex () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 21:32:19 -0600
you said it was 'fun' implying that you felt happy after you had accomplished the task ( decoding the string in this case ). so unless you naturally have fun decoding simple strings, then this must of been a new experience for you/challenging one to solve On Jan 21, 2008 9:28 PM, Maxim <fulldisc () swill org> wrote:
where did I use the word challenging? On Mon, 2008-01-21 at 21:25 -0600, reepex wrote:... if base64 was challenging for you then maybe you should switch fields of work On Jan 21, 2008 9:04 PM, Maxim <fulldisc () swill org> wrote: that was fun ... :-) stuff like that should be on people's job interviews. On Mon, 2008-01-21 at 21:59 -0500, Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote: > Remember that although 99.98% of the Internet population ends up using it, > 99.97% are totally unaware of the fact because they have point-n-drool GUI > interfaces to hide the gory details from them. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Re: [Professional IT Security Providers - Exposed] PlanNetGroup ( F ), (continued)
- Re: [Professional IT Security Providers - Exposed] PlanNetGroup ( F ) Nate McFeters (Jan 21)
- Re: [Professional IT Security Providers - Exposed] PlanNetGroup ( F ) Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 21)
- Re: [Professional IT Security Providers - Exposed] PlanNetGroup ( F ) Nick FitzGerald (Jan 21)
- Re: [Professional IT Security Providers - Exposed] PlanNetGroup ( F ) damncon (Jan 21)
- Re: [Professional IT Security Providers - Exposed] PlanNetGroup ( F ) Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 21)
- Re: [Professional IT Security Providers - Exposed] PlanNetGroup ( F ) Nate McFeters (Jan 21)
- Re: [Professional IT Security Providers - Exposed] PlanNetGroup ( F ) Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 21)
- Re: [Professional IT Security Providers - Exposed] PlanNetGroup ( F ) Maxim (Jan 21)
- Re: [Professional IT Security Providers - Exposed] PlanNetGroup ( F ) reepex (Jan 21)
- Re: [Professional IT Security Providers - Exposed] PlanNetGroup ( F ) Nick FitzGerald (Jan 21)
- Message not available
- Re: [Professional IT Security Providers - Exposed] PlanNetGroup ( F ) reepex (Jan 21)
- Re: [Professional IT Security Providers -Exposed] PlanNetGroup ( F ) nate . mcfeters (Jan 21)
- Re: [Professional IT Security Providers - Exposed] PlanNetGroup ( F ) Harry Hoffman (Jan 21)
- Re: [Professional IT Security Providers - Exposed] PlanNetGroup ( F ) Nick FitzGerald (Jan 21)
- Re: [Professional IT Security Providers - Exposed] PlanNetGroup ( F ) Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 21)
- Re: [Professional IT Security Providers - Exposed] PlanNetGroup ( F ) Harry Hoffman (Jan 21)
- Re: [Professional IT Security Providers - Exposed] PlanNetGroup ( F ) reepex (Jan 21)
- Re: [Professional IT Security Providers - Exposed] PlanNetGroup ( F ) Harry Hoffman (Jan 21)
- Re: [Professional IT Security Providers - Exposed] PlanNetGroup ( F ) Pat (Jan 21)
- Re: [Professional IT Security Providers - Exposed] PlanNetGroup ( F ) reepex (Jan 21)
- Re: [Professional IT Security Providers - Exposed] PlanNetGroup ( F ) Nick FitzGerald (Jan 21)
