Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Skype chat encryption with OTR
From: "Eliah Kagan" <degeneracypressure () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 03:07:46 -0400
On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 13:00:49 +1000, rawket wrote:/There is no denying that an OTR Conversation has been encrypted.. Its because the private keys change ultra-frequently, and the keys are short lived that it provides the 'plausible deniability'
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 2:28 AM, Tonnerre Lombard wrote:
Not exactly. The plausible deniability is due to the fact that the signature is executed using a symmetric key known to both parties, so that either party (but noone else) could have sent the message.
You're saying the parties to the conversation can plausibly deny they sent the messages because they're the only ones who could have sent them? What? -Eliah _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Skype chat encryption with OTR Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) (Jun 18)
- Re: Skype chat encryption with OTR Ureleet (Jun 18)
- Re: Skype chat encryption with OTR Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) (Jun 18)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Skype chat encryption with OTR rawket (Jun 18)
- Re: Skype chat encryption with OTR Tonnerre Lombard (Jun 18)
- Re: Skype chat encryption with OTR Eliah Kagan (Jun 19)
- Re: Skype chat encryption with OTR rawket (Jun 19)
- Re: Skype chat encryption with OTR Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) (Jun 19)
- Re: Skype chat encryption with OTR I)ruid (Jun 19)
- Re: Skype chat encryption with OTR Tonnerre Lombard (Jun 18)
- Re: Skype chat encryption with OTR JM (Jun 19)
- Re: Skype chat encryption with OTR Tonnerre Lombard (Jun 19)
- Re: Skype chat encryption with OTR Ureleet (Jun 18)
