
Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: [RFC] Eye diagram & sampling points - Very Low Signal to Noise Ratio on FD
From: "Karma" <karma () frij com au>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2008 16:50:00 +1000
I recommend altering the sampling spot & frequency, once the frequency of mails start rising to a rather high level, take a sample, and thrash the rest. If required, repeat over a period of at least 3 days to manage the lag & noise. Oversampling could yield erraneous results and could lead to segmentation of the FD community. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steve Lord" <slord () mandalorian com> To: "Anders B Jansson" <hdw () kallisti se> Cc: <full-disclosure () lists grok org uk> Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 7:55 AM Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] [RFC] Very Low Signal to Noise Ratio on FD
Anders B Jansson wrote:Od Orf wrote:On a personal level, I have tried in the past to filter out posts which fail to meet certain criteria using both blacklists and whitelists of content keywords. I've found these to be ineffective inJust filter out all messages with the phrase "n3td3v" in adress, subject or body and you'll get very close to a functional FD list. A large majority of the noise is either from, replying to or mentioning that keyword.You'd be amazed at how good that works. Even just filtering n3td3v's comments allows you to watch the drama unfold through the responses, something I'm sure many find more entertaining than the source. -- Steve Lord Mandalorian Security Services Get the latest Information Security News at Infosec Update: http://news.mandalorian.com _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Re: [RFC] Very Low Signal to Noise Ratio on FD, (continued)
- Re: [RFC] Very Low Signal to Noise Ratio on FD Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 15)
- Re: [RFC] Very Low Signal to Noise Ratio on FD Nicola Del Vacchio (Sep 15)
- Re: [RFC] Very Low Signal to Noise Ratio on FD n3td3v (Sep 15)
- Re: [RFC] Very Low Signal to Noise Ratio on FD coderman (Sep 15)
- Re: [RFC] Very Low Signal to Noise Ratio on FD TJ (Sep 15)
- Re: [RFC] Very Low Signal to Noise Ratio on FD Chris Pritchard (Sep 15)
- Re: [RFC] Very Low Signal to Noise Ratio on FD Anders B Jansson (Sep 15)
- Re: [RFC] Very Low Signal to Noise Ratio on FD n3td3v (Sep 15)
- Re: [RFC] Very Low Signal to Noise Ratio on FD Razi Shaban (Sep 15)
- Re: [RFC] Very Low Signal to Noise Ratio on FD Steve Lord (Sep 15)
- Re: [RFC] Eye diagram & sampling points - Very Low Signal to Noise Ratio on FD Karma (Sep 16)
- Re: [RFC] Very Low Signal to Noise Ratio on FD mach () switched com (Sep 17)
- Re: [RFC] Very Low Signal to Noise Ratio on FD n3td3v (Sep 15)
- Re: [RFC] Very Low Signal to Noise Ratio on FD Tonnerre Lombard (Sep 15)
- Re: [RFC] Very Low Signal to Noise Ratio on FD Michael Simpson (Sep 16)
- Re: [RFC] Very Low Signal to Noise Ratio on FD n3td3v (Sep 16)
- Re: [RFC] Very Low Signal to Noise Ratio on FD Ureleet (Sep 16)
- Re: [RFC] Very Low Signal to Noise Ratio on FD Michael Simpson (Sep 16)