Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Fwd: Re: Looking at SSH scans passwords (honeypot analysis)
From: Michal <michal () ionic co uk>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 11:24:23 +0000
On 14/01/2010 22:55, Elliot Fernandes wrote:
What I can say is that, the person who was trying to access your honeypot was using a wordlist, albeit of bad quality because the wordlist contains a large degree of statistical randomness. For the most of us, passwords consist of dictionary words, so a good wordlist would contain that and permutations of it, not just gibberish. By the way, I've scouraged the internet for wordlists and I've seen entries with !@#$%^&*( , !@#$% , !@#$ , !@# and the others you've included.
On an American Keyboard !@#$%^&*( is shift and the numbers 1 to 9, for English it's !"£$%^&*( but as he said it's just wordlists filled with that, thinking someone might use it as a password, which I guess is possible, it's probably better then your husbands name for example, but still shit _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Looking at SSH scans passwords (honeypot analysis) dd (Jan 14)
- Re: Looking at SSH scans passwords (honeypot analysis) Elliot Fernandes (Jan 15)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Fwd: Re: Looking at SSH scans passwords (honeypot analysis) Michal (Jan 15)
