Full Disclosure mailing list archives
300 Comparative Tests Driven Against Suricata and Snort
From: Sebastien Damaye <sebastien.damaye () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 05:36:42 +0200
For years, Snort (developed and maintained by SourceFire) has been the de facto standard for open source Intrusion Detection/Prevention Systems (IDS/IPS). Its engine combines the benefits of signatures, protocols, and anomaly-based inspection and has become the most widely deployed IDS/IPS in the world. Suricata, a new and less widespread product developed by the Open Information Security Foundation (OISF), has recently appeared, and seems really promising. It is also based on signatures but integrates revolutionary techniques. This engine embeds a HTTP normalizer and parser (HTP library) that provides very advanced processing of HTTP streams, enabling the understanding of traffic on the 7th level of the OSI model. More than 300 tests have been conducted against two platforms receiving the same payloads. Based on these tests, conclusions will be discussed to present the advantages and limitations of these two products. Read more here: http://www.aldeid.com/index.php/Suricata-vs-snort -- Cordialement/Regards, Sébastien Damaye http://www.aldeid.com
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- 300 Comparative Tests Driven Against Suricata and Snort Sebastien Damaye (Apr 14)
