Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Ubuntu 11.10 now unsecure by default
From: xD 0x41 <secn3t () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2011 08:16:08 +1100
Ok well how about lets put it simply... MS have had a Guest user, i believe it is MSUSER*** since what, 1970 ? I know locally, i could possibly manipulate registry keys and make this user 'login' ready... but at this point i have local ax, so a. we know ms guest user cannot be touched remotely , or is someone putting up theyre own 0day wich can remotely change ms's inbuilt user... (as i thought, no one will answer that bit... there is no way to exploit it). So if we compare these two os, one would be classed as crappy (windows), one would be classed as entry-level... now the reason why ubuntu has this look is simple, you have 3 versions of one OS, Kubuntu Xubuntu and ubuntu , all split into server-client categorys, and these are totally different configurations... so stop trying to say Ubuntu is PRO, it aint, it is handed out on magazines, like many smaller os are, and then you have places like APC mag, doing direct changeovers from windows to ubuntu, was a 2010 issue wich actually did this, and yea, i could prolly find exactly what mag, but i dont think that is alone... Ubuntu is portrayed as entry level by its owners, and then having a thousand local xploits, and people like the e-caliber , making addons for ubuntu, i would say the popularity of it, is growing less... so dont worry, im sure there will b less exploitations of Ubuntu..just not this year :) have a nice day, m$ r00l users. xd On 19 November 2011 07:04, Johan Nestaas <johannestaas () gmail com> wrote:
Sometimes it bothers me that everyone says Ubuntu is made for newbs and that you're expected to switch distros as soon as you know enough to do it. I worked as an intern with some folks who developed 802.11s, secure mesh networking, and they mostly used Ubuntu. I find it extremely fast to install, set up IDE's, and get a dev workstation up and running. I've never had an easier time installing a printer. Sure, that helps newbies, but it also makes work happen quick. If any problems come up, you can't beat their user base and forums. I love the freedom of choice, and I switch it up every few months to see how the other distros are doing, but generally I'm back to ubuntu in a few weeks. Also, maybe I'm wrong about this and there are other reasons, but the newest backtrack is ubuntu based, and they always mention that their distro is meant for experienced linux users (and more of a toolkit than anything). I don't know, I guess I feel like ubuntu should be cut some slack for being newb friendly. It's not such a bad thing. On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Olivier <feuille () bibibox fr> wrote:On 11/18/2011 03:10 PM, Dan Kaminsky wrote:On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 5:01 AM, <Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu <mailto:Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu>> wrote: On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 15:53:41 CST, C de-Avillez said: > There is no guest account on an Ubuntu server, so at least there > this is not a real/perceived risk. And nobody's *ever* installed the desktop version on a server because they didn't know any better, especially from Ubuntu's target audience. Gotcha. ;) OK, seriously. If you're sitting in front of a machine that's presenting you a login prompt, you've got enough privileges to insert a bootable USB/CD and pull all the data / make yourself an account (FDE/Bios PW notwithstanding).My disk is password protected, and the whole system (except /boot) is encrypted. Ubuntu guest account is definitively the best way to hack a running laptop (or workstation). -- Olivier _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Re: Ubuntu 11.10 now unsecure by default, (continued)
- Re: Ubuntu 11.10 now unsecure by default Mihamina Rakotomandimby (Nov 23)
- Re: Ubuntu 11.10 now unsecure by default Dan Ballance (Nov 23)
- Re: Ubuntu 11.10 now unsecure by default Johan Nestaas (Nov 19)
- Re: Ubuntu 11.10 now unsecure by default james (Nov 19)
- Re: Ubuntu 11.10 now unsecure by default Dan Kaminsky (Nov 19)
- Re: Ubuntu 11.10 now unsecure by default james (Nov 19)
- Re: Ubuntu 11.10 now unsecure by default Dan Kaminsky (Nov 19)
- Re: Ubuntu 11.10 now unsecure by default xD 0x41 (Nov 19)
- Re: Ubuntu 11.10 now unsecure by default xD 0x41 (Nov 19)
- Re: Ubuntu 11.10 now unsecure by default GloW - XD (Nov 19)
- Re: Ubuntu 11.10 now unsecure by default xD 0x41 (Nov 19)
- Re: Ubuntu 11.10 now unsecure by default Tom Grace (Nov 18)
- Re: Ubuntu 11.10 now unsecure by default James Condron (Nov 17)
- Re: Ubuntu 11.10 now unsecure by default Dan Kaminsky (Nov 19)
- Re: Ubuntu 11.10 now unsecure by default xD 0x41 (Nov 20)
- Re: Ubuntu 11.10 now unsecure by default Memory Vandal (Nov 23)
- Re: Ubuntu 11.10 now unsecure by default xD 0x41 (Nov 20)
- Re: Ubuntu 11.10 now unsecure by default Ferenc Kovacs (Nov 20)
- Re: Ubuntu 11.10 now unsecure by default Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 20)
