Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: ifIndex overflow (Linux Kernel - net/core/dev.c) [maybe offtopic]
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 15:34:21 -0500
On Thu, 07 Feb 2013 20:28:31 +0100, Daniel Preussker said:
I was looking into the net/core/dev.c from the current Kernel (previous also have this) and found out that ifIndex gets incremented by an endless loop. After creating 4 billion pseudo-eth devices I finally got it to overflow and endless loop, had to kill the kernel - fun right?
I wonder what /proc/slabinfo and related memory statistics looked like after 3.9 billion devices created. You'll need a fairly beefy box to roll that counter without OOM'ing the kernel first.
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- ifIndex overflow (Linux Kernel - net/core/dev.c) [maybe offtopic] Daniel Preussker (Feb 08)
- Re: ifIndex overflow (Linux Kernel - net/core/dev.c) [maybe offtopic] Daniel Corbe (Feb 10)
- Re: ifIndex overflow (Linux Kernel - net/core/dev.c) [maybe offtopic] Jeffrey Walton (Feb 10)
- Message not available
- Re: ifIndex overflow (Linux Kernel - net/core/dev.c) [maybe offtopic] Daniel Preussker (Feb 11)
- Re: ifIndex overflow (Linux Kernel - net/core/dev.c) [maybe offtopic] Jeffrey Walton (Feb 10)
- Re: ifIndex overflow (Linux Kernel - net/core/dev.c) [maybe offtopic] Daniel Corbe (Feb 10)
- Re: ifIndex overflow (Linux Kernel - net/core/dev.c) [maybe offtopic] Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 12)
