funsec mailing list archives
Re: The end of Phishing in sight?
From: Florian Weimer <fw () deneb enyo de>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 23:43:23 +0200
* Pierre Vandevenne:
FW> In Germany, we have both: two-factor authentication and phishing. FW> This should tell you something about the effectiveness of two-factor FW> authentication. *sigh* Well, it's not a question of agreeing or disagreeing - just thinking about it. Do you have any links to successful phising cases involving both password/login combos and tokens supporting digital signatures? I'd really like see the details of such cases.
Two-factor authentication does not necessarily mean "digital signatures". In May 2000, a proof-of-concept attack on the German Internet banking standard HBCI (which is smartcard-based) was published, involving a trojanized end user system. Even card readers with separate displays and PIN pads cannot thwart such attacks because the display contents is controlled by the host software and does not necessarily match the signed transaction. This technology is not in widespread use, so it's currently not targeted to my knowledge. The two-factor authentication technology used in Germany is PIN plus a list of one-time passwords, one for each transaction. Fairly low-tech, but as secure as you can get without dedicated user terminals. Obviously, the OTP does not depend on the transaction contents, so it's still subject to MITM attacks, but this is a property share with many of the proposed high-tech two-factor authentication schemes. There are plenty reports of attacks involving trojan horses which change the contents of the browser window on the fly, and intercept transmitted PINs and TANs, but the German press usually calls this "phishing" as well, even if no spoofed web site was involved.
note: I have no link to that industry and would have resented having to pay for the token if I had had to.
Me too, especially if it means I cannot repudiate fraudulent transactions anymore because the system is considered "secure". _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Re: The end of Phishing in sight?, (continued)
- Re: The end of Phishing in sight? Dave Dittrich (Oct 17)
- RE: The end of Phishing in sight? Richard M. Smith (Oct 17)
- RE: The end of Phishing in sight? Nick FitzGerald (Oct 17)
- Re: The end of Phishing in sight? Tom Van Vleck (Oct 17)
- RE: The end of Phishing in sight? Richard M. Smith (Oct 17)
- Re[2]: The end of Phishing in sight? Pierre Vandevenne (Oct 17)
- Re: The end of Phishing in sight? Blue Boar (Oct 17)
- Re: The end of Phishing in sight? Paul Schmehl (Oct 17)
- Re: The end of Phishing in sight? Florian Weimer (Oct 17)
- Re: The end of Phishing in sight? Dave Dittrich (Oct 17)
- Re: The end of Phishing in sight? Florian Weimer (Oct 17)
- Re[2]: The end of Phishing in sight? Pierre Vandevenne (Oct 17)
- Re: The end of Phishing in sight? Florian Weimer (Oct 17)
- Re[2]: The end of Phishing in sight? Pierre Vandevenne (Oct 17)
- Re: Re[2]: The end of Phishing in sight? Douglas F. Calvert (Oct 17)
- Re[4]: The end of Phishing in sight? Pierre Vandevenne (Oct 17)
- Re[2]: The end of Phishing in sight? Pierre Vandevenne (Oct 17)
- Re: The end of Phishing in sight? Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 17)
- Re: The end of Phishing in sight? Blue Boar (Oct 17)
- Re[4]: The end of Phishing in sight? Pierre Vandevenne (Oct 17)
