funsec mailing list archives
Re: Ilfak's interview is being slashdotted
From: "Jon O." <jono () networkcommand com>
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 16:00:37 -0800
On 07-Jan-2006, Pierre Vandevenne wrote:
Good Afternoon, I am still amazed at the level of confusion around this one btw... The fix was not a patch in the usual sense of the term. It may sound like a rethorical distinction, but it isn't: no windows files were modified by applying the fix. At the conceptual level, what the fix did isn't very different from what early DOS TSRs did when they hooked an interrupt vector.
It's an on-the-fly in-memory patch like software crackers use. See the old-school: http://www.searchlores.org/protec/whydwcr.htm Should we call this "vulnerability cracking" ;) ? _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Ilfak's interview is being slashdotted Gadi Evron (Jan 06)
- Re: Ilfak's interview is being slashdotted Pierre Vandevenne (Jan 06)
- Re: Ilfak's interview is being slashdotted Jon O. (Jan 06)
- Re[2]: Ilfak's interview is being slashdotted Pierre Vandevenne (Jan 06)
- Re: Ilfak's interview is being slashdotted Matthew Murphy (Jan 06)
- Re: Ilfak's interview is being slashdotted Jon O. (Jan 06)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Ilfak's interview is being slashdotted Fergie (Jan 06)
- Re: Ilfak's interview is being slashdotted Pierre Vandevenne (Jan 06)
