funsec mailing list archives
RE: why Senator Stevens is right on Net Neutrality
From: "Young, Keith" <Keith.Young () montgomerycountymd gov>
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 13:14:48 -0400
From Brian Loe:
All phone companies are required to allow competitors use their infrastructure.
For voice, yes. The FCC does not require competition on most data or
cable TV service.
And yes, I know about this topic -- see recent article:
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,1984353,00.asp
What you call a monopoly I obviously call a successful company.
Microsoft, AT&T why not...
IBM, ---> CA, Microsoft, HP
Pepsi, ---> Coke
and Hershey's? --> Mars
Who is Verizon's competitor for non-cell service on the east coast of
the U.S.?
--Keith
Keith Young, Security Official
Department of Technology Services
Montgomery County, Maryland
phone - (240) 777-2955
-----Original Message-----
From: funsec-bounces () linuxbox org [mailto:funsec-bounces () linuxbox org]
On Behalf Of Brian Loe
Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2006 11:49 AM
To: Dude VanWinkle
Cc: FunSec LList
Subject: Re: [funsec] why Senator Stevens is right on Net Neutrality
On 7/6/06, Dude VanWinkle <dudevanwinkle () gmail com> wrote:
And you are Free to travel back in time and take advantage of a monopoly for a hundred years, using the money generated from ownership
of that monopoly (in addition to govt subsidies) to build a nationwide
network of wires that no individual can come close to competing with.
All phone companies are required to allow competitors use their infrastructure. Other phone companies have sprung up and done well - there are two local phone companies in the KC area, only one has every built a system to support their services. Cable companies can provide every service a telco can. Satellite will, eventually, be a third provider realm. What you call a monopoly I obviously call a successful company. Microsoft, AT&T why not IBM, Pepsi, and Hershey's? While we're on the subject of you being a communist, how much extra cash do you have each payday? Can you start sending some of that to me as I'm often short on expendable funds and I'd like to be able to visit the bar more often. _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list. _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Re: why Senator Stevens is right on Net Neutrality, (continued)
- Re: why Senator Stevens is right on Net Neutrality Drsolly (Jul 06)
- Re: why Senator Stevens is right on Net Neutrality Brian Loe (Jul 06)
- Re: why Senator Stevens is right on Net Neutrality Drsolly (Jul 06)
- Re: why Senator Stevens is right on Net Neutrality Brian Loe (Jul 06)
- Re: why Senator Stevens is right on Net Neutrality Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 06)
- Re: why Senator Stevens is right on Net Neutrality Drsolly (Jul 06)
- Re: why Senator Stevens is right on Net Neutrality Gadi Evron (Jul 06)
- Re: why Senator Stevens is right on Net Neutrality Brian Loe (Jul 06)
- Re: why Senator Stevens is right on Net Neutrality Brian Loe (Jul 06)
