funsec mailing list archives
Re: Shocker: DKIM antispam standard can't stop spam
From: "Dude VanWinkle" <dudevanwinkle () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 16:47:02 -0400
On 7/13/07, Dude VanWinkle <dudevanwinkle () gmail com> wrote:
On 7/13/07, Paul Ferguson <fergdawg () netzero net> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > - -- "Dude VanWinkle" <dudevanwinkle () gmail com> wrote: > > >AOL and Yahoo probably have to most incentive for reducing spam. > >Consider how much of storage their storage is dedicated to spam? 10%? > >40%? How much of their bandwidth is used for the same? Thats a lot of > >profit to be harvested for just doing the right thing. > > For what its worth, Yahoo! deployed DKIM into Yahoo! mail in > 2004: > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DomainKeys > > ...and: > > http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys bob@vista:/# nslookup > set type=txt > aol.com Server: 68.87.68.162 Address: 68.87.68.162#53 Non-authoritative answer: aol.com text = "v=spf1 ip4:152.163.225.0/24 ip4:205.188.139.0/24 ip4:205.188.144.0/24 ip4:205.188.156.0/23 ip4:205.188.159.0/24 ip4:64.12.136.0/23 ip4:64.12.138.0/24 ptr:mx.aol.com ?all" aol.com text = "spf2.0/pra ip4:152.163.225.0/24 ip4:205.188.139.0/24 ip4:205.188.144.0/24 ip4:205.188.156.0/23 ip4:205.188.159.0/24 ip4:64.12.136.0/23 ip4:64.12.138.0/24 ptr:mx.aol.com ?all"
of course the ?all shows how much faith they put into it lol -JP<who thinks RFC's should exclude wishy-washy> _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Re: Shocker: DKIM antispam standard can't stop spam, (continued)
- Re: Shocker: DKIM antispam standard can't stop spam Dude VanWinkle (Jul 13)
- Re: Shocker: DKIM antispam standard can't stop spam Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 13)
- Re: Shocker: DKIM antispam standard can't stop spam Nick FitzGerald (Jul 13)
- Re: Shocker: DKIM antispam standard can't stop spam Paul Vixie (Jul 13)
- Re: Shocker: DKIM antispam standard can't stop spam John Payne (Jul 13)
- Re: Shocker: DKIM antispam standard can't stop spam Nick FitzGerald (Jul 13)
- Re: Shocker: DKIM antispam standard can't stop spam John Payne (Jul 15)
- Re: Shocker: DKIM antispam standard can't stop spam Dude VanWinkle (Jul 13)
- Re: Shocker: DKIM antispam standard can't stop spam Dude VanWinkle (Jul 13)
