funsec mailing list archives
Re: Editorial: ICANN's WHOIS Policy Shift Would Be Criminal N egligence
From: Sean Donelan <sean () donelan com>
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 13:43:16 -0400 (EDT)
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007, Paul Ferguson wrote:
You agree with ICANN's plan, or Computerworld's opinion of it?I agree that ICANN's WHOIS policy shift would be akin to criminal negligence.
Criminals will abuse the system either way the policy goes. They are criminals. If ICANN requires all domains publish WHOIS information, criminals will take the public information and using it for identity theft, harrasment, etc.E.g. sending out fake domain registration renewal bills, finding out the location of shelters for abused women/men/children, etc.
If ICANN allows domains not to publish WHOIS information, criminals will conceal their identity behind that privacy. E.g. concealing the same person or organization registered multiple names, pretending to me located in a different state, country, continent, etc.Besides, don't criminals already use fake credit cards and phony registration details to get domain names?
_______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Re: Editorial: ICANN's WHOIS Policy Shift Would Be Criminal N egligence Paul Ferguson (Aug 13)
- Re: Editorial: ICANN's WHOIS Policy Shift Would Be Criminal N egligence Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 13)
- RE: Editorial: ICANN's WHOIS Policy Shift Would Be CriminalN egligence Larry Seltzer (Aug 13)
- Re: Editorial: ICANN's WHOIS Policy Shift Would Be Criminal N egligence Sean Donelan (Aug 13)
- Re: Editorial: ICANN's WHOIS Policy Shift Would Be Criminal N egligence Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 13)
