Re: medical guns!

["Tomas L. Byrnes" <tomb () byrneit net>]

> But I'd like to apologize to the list: my (initial) reply to Tomas was
> kept
> private for a reason.  I don't know why he felt the need to bring the
> list
> back into it, but rest assured, I won't be chiming in on this
> conversation
> again.

Sorry for the cock-up. I thought I had messed up by not replying to all
when only one name showed in the TO.

To the issue of why discussions about firearms are polarizing, it's
pretty simple: The banners see my ownership of them as a threat to all
mankind, and I see their desire to ban them as leaving me defenseless
against thugs, either in or out of government.

What the banners don't get is that you can't ban guns. You can just
prevent law abiding citizens from having them. 

The technology is well understood, and they are widely manufactured and
available for military and police force reasons, and thus readily
available to criminals.


_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.