funsec mailing list archives

Re: standards for security in software


From: Donal <irldexter () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 16:18:47 +1000

Time to COME ON DOWN... to the securitymetrics list/conf... and join in the fun!

MiniMetricon coming up in SF
http://www.securitymetrics.org/content/Wiki.jsp?page=Metricon3.5

S'got to be more about these guys too http://www.sei.cmu.edu/

D.

On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 1:17 PM, Jon Kibler <Jon.Kibler () aset com> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Larry Seltzer wrote:
Below is the section of S.773 mandating that NIST establish ?measurable
and auditable cybersecurity standards? for systems and networks.

Do standards along these lines exist already? I guess I?d be surprised
if nothing like this exists, but the only ones I?m aware of don?t have a
lot of real world-relevance, like C1 and B certifiability.

Some of it is already in place or at least being worked on, like the
standard configurations (see
http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Security/Standardizing-the-Federal-Desktop/) or
the vulnerability specification stuff.

Do others think the other elements and the big picture of this is practical?

Larry Seltzer
eWEEK.com Security Center Editor
http://security.eweek.com/
http://blogs.pcmag.com/securitywatch/
Contributing Editor, PC Magazine
larry.seltzer () ziffdavisenterprise com
<mailto:larry.seltzer () ziffdavisenterprise com>

Larry,

All standards with which I am familiar, and I think I have a good grasp
of what is out there, have to do with:
 1) Hardening systems and networks
 2) Policy and Processes
 3) Best Practices

I am not familiar with anything that addresses software development
security per se. As I recall, even IEEE/ISO 12207, which replaced the
old MilStd-498, does not address software security processes.

I think that spending money to specify the best practices for software
security and developing secure software is a great place to put our tax
dollars. It will be money well spent.

Jon
- --
Jon R. Kibler
Chief Technical Officer
Advanced Systems Engineering Technology, Inc.
Charleston, SC  USA
o: 843-849-8214
c: 843-813-2924 (NEW!)
s: 843-564-4224
http://www.linkedin.com/in/jonrkibler

My PGP Fingerprint is:
BAA2 1F2C 5543 5D25 4636 A392 515C 5045 CF39 4253


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkncF1UACgkQUVxQRc85QlN1DACfc/e8uxz7wc8u2podQ6Fm1O5O
cnwAnjR72u66DoR97fKuyG5qEodvKsMZ
=tk/n
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




==================================================
Filtered by: TRUSTEM.COM's Email Filtering Service
http://www.trustem.com/
No Spam. No Viruses. Just Good Clean Email.


_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.




-- 
________________________________________________________________________________
Donal ( http://bsdosx.blogspot.com/ )

"Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more
violent. It takes a touch of genius -- and a lot of courage -- to move
in the opposite direction." Albert Einstein

_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.


Current thread: