Re: OT: CDC recommends male circumcision as very effective to fight HIV (AIDS)

[der Mouse <mouse () rodents-montreal org>]

> > significant, is not all that good - certainly not enough to rate
> > "very effective".  Perhaps I'm just behind the times, [...]
> I call the claimed 60% better chances of not attracting a disease
> very effective.

60%?  I don't know that _I_ would call that "very effective", but I do
think it's defensible wording for that level of effectiveness.

However, I wasn't talking about what the article claimed, but what I
recalled from other reading about the "circumcision inhibits AIDS"
thing.

> Here is a better URL: http://www.nydailynews.com/[...]

If that reporting is actually right, then it was my memory flaking out.
Perhaps it's just been too long since I read anything on it.

/~\ The ASCII                             Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
 X  Against HTML                mouse () rodents-montreal org
/ \ Email!           7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.