funsec mailing list archives
Re: Family tech support
From: "David Lodge" <dave () cirt net>
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 23:08:40 -0000
On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 22:02:49 -0000, Nick FitzGerald <nick () virus-l demon co uk> wrote:
First, and I'm no MS apologist, the problem set you describe has usually been avoidable _if_ the IT folk at said enterprise actually do the job, read the fine manuals and roll out the new version with policies enforcing the "use format X" option (or even just push such policies as part of their standard environment management stuff.
Ah; you've never met consultants or marketeers then :-)
Second -- and much bigger -- is that while it can be a PitA to Email the sender back and explain how to "Save as... and choose the 'correct' file format" that is rather different than the situation where the OOO user sent a Word-capable format document that does not open properly, or that does, but is clearly seriously munged or quickly becomes that way after you, say, decide that there needs to be a comma after that word in the opening sentence.
And, that's the old reason why the word format should be killed for data exchange: nobody knows it, not even Microsoft. Use ODT (not ooxml, as not even Word can write it according to the spec).
My "complaints" with OOO are not that it does not (natively) do MS formats, but that it is incomprehensibly buggy in _all_ its format- handling capabilities.
And this is where I have the problem with your argument: I have multiple files that I've written on my server that go back to April 2001, when it was StarOffice 5, and I can read them all exactly as they were when I wrote them; 5 different computers ago and using a different Operating System (IIRC it was on SuSE 7). The only time I've ever had a problem with OOo reading files is generally due to badly mangled word docs. These are also not trivial docs: they have embedded objects, images, layout change and a host of styles. I wonder whether this is a YMMV situation. _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Re: What was that about hubris? Rich Kulawiec (Oct 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: What was that about hubris? Rich Kulawiec (Oct 01)
- Re: What was that about hubris? chris (Oct 01)
- Re: What was that about hubris? Paul Vixie (Oct 01)
- Re: What was that about hubris? chris (Oct 01)
