funsec mailing list archives
Re: Actual Climate Change Thread
From: Martin Tomasek <tomasek () ufe cz>
Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2009 12:08:43 +0100
Tomas L. Byrnes wrote:
Wow, this reminds me of something form the Dada engine, or the "social Text" affair.Not sure where to begin in deconstruction, but it seems that the following statement:"Weather has alpha-stable distribution. This means varince is infinite, at least in theory." Is demonstrably false, since at some value of significant enough atmospheric excitation there would cease to be an atmosphere due to the gasses achieving escape velocity, as the most obvious example of some sort of limitation on the system.
Hm.. another example of system governed by stable distribution is time series of stock prices. Economists are arguing in similar way, but are unable to come with anything better. Instead, they stick to gaussian and lognormal distributions (which is valid for short time interval samples from series).
My guess is that a more valid model of weather is that it is variable within bounds set by climate, and climate within bounds set by insolation, albedo, gas composition (I doubt we're about to get a methane atmosphere any time soon, FE), etc.
You are describing almost the same model. But you sidestepped question of distribution of - say - temperature. What distribution will you get for temperature in your model?
IOW, it's actually in dynamic equilibrium locally, but it's gross equilibrium is static in a relatively small spectrum, absent some major external force.For something more in-line with the expertise of this group, some examination of the (awful IMNSHO) actual code used at the CRU is in order:http://di2.nu/foia/HARRY_READ_ME-0.html
Yes, they can't write readable code and are unable to use DBMSs. But what did you expect? They are scientists, not programmers.
-- Martin Tomasek "Those who sacrifice liberty for security deserve neither." --Benjamin Franklin
_______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Re: Was the ClimateGate Hacker Justified? Join the Debate!, (continued)
- Re: Was the ClimateGate Hacker Justified? Join the Debate! Michael Graham (Nov 26)
- Re: Was the ClimateGate Hacker Justified? Join the Debate! chris (Nov 27)
- Re: Was the ClimateGate Hacker Justified? Join the Debate! Martin Tomasek (Nov 27)
- Re: Was the ClimateGate Hacker Justified? Join the Debate! G. D. Fuego (Nov 27)
- Actual Climate Change Thread (was: Was the ClimateGate Hacker Justified?) chris (Nov 27)
- Re: Actual Climate Change Thread Martin Tomasek (Nov 28)
- Re: Actual Climate Change Thread chris (Nov 28)
- Re: Actual Climate Change Thread Martin Tomasek (Dec 01)
- Re: Actual Climate Change Thread Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 01)
- Re: Actual Climate Change Thread Tomas L. Byrnes (Dec 01)
- Re: Actual Climate Change Thread Martin Tomasek (Dec 02)
- Why it sucks to live in Southern Chile Alex Eckelberry (Dec 02)
- Re: Why it sucks to live in Southern Chile Blue Boar (Dec 02)
- Re: Why it sucks to live in Southern Chile Paul M Moriarty (Dec 02)
- Re: Why it sucks to live in Southern Chile Larry Seltzer (Dec 02)
- Re: Why it sucks to live in Southern Chile Paul M Moriarty (Dec 02)
- Re: Why it sucks to live in Southern Chile Larry Seltzer (Dec 02)
- Re: Why it sucks to live in Southern Chile Paul Ferguson (Dec 02)
- Re: Why it sucks to live in Southern Chile Michael Graham (Dec 02)
- Re: Why it sucks to live in Southern Chile Robert Graham (Dec 02)
- Re: Actual Climate Change Thread Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 29)
