funsec mailing list archives
Re: Colorado Supreme Court: Using a Stolen Social Security Number is Not Identity Theft
From: Jeffrey Walton <noloader () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 02:25:55 -0500
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 12:50 AM, Nick FitzGerald <nick () virus-l demon co uk> wrote:
Jeffrey Walton wrote:* Criticizing a Federal Judge's decision elicits a visit from two US Marshals.You don't think the somewhat "threatening" or "menacing" tone, and use of the word "assassination" might have contributed to the level of response? Note that "terrorism" and "threatening behavior" are generally judged in terms of the affect felt by the "threatened" (or "target") and NOT by the (claimed) incentive of the threatener...
I view the criticism as "sharp tongued" and nothing more. A sharp tongue is one of my redeeming qualities :) Unfortunately (for most folks who are subjugated), judges, in effect, cannot be removed. Or more correctly, will not be removed (confer: Judge James Ware, United States District Court for the Northern District of California [1,2,3]). But as a public official, they are subject to criticism. Perhaps they should consider their internal fortitude before seeking and accepting a public office. I do not suffer their "fears of the dark". Jeff As a post script, consider: Pat Robertson, a US based Christian religious leader, called for the assassination of a world leader. The US government did not take action during a time when Muslim religious leaders were being labeled as terrorist for the same. So I find it laughable that the US government took time out of their busy day for me. [1] Cribbing a civil-rights tragedy. http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-19979949.html [2] Lying Federal Judge James Ware, http://www.fa-ir.org/ai/judgeware.htm [3] James Ware (judge), http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Ware_%28judge%29 _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Colorado Supreme Court: Using a Stolen Social Security Number is Not Identity Theft Jeffrey Walton (Nov 16)
- Re: Colorado Supreme Court: Using a Stolen Social Security Number is Not Identity Theft Tomas L. Byrnes (Nov 17)
- Re: Colorado Supreme Court: Using a Stolen Social Security Number is Not Identity Theft Jeffrey Walton (Nov 17)
- Re: Colorado Supreme Court: Using a Stolen Social Security Number is Not Identity Theft Joel Esler (Nov 17)
- Re: Colorado Supreme Court: Using a Stolen Social Security Number is Not Identity Theft Paul Ferguson (Nov 17)
- Re: Colorado Supreme Court: Using a Stolen Social Security Number is Not Identity Theft Jeffrey Walton (Nov 18)
- Re: Colorado Supreme Court: Using a Stolen Social Security Number is Not Identity Theft Nick FitzGerald (Nov 18)
- Re: Colorado Supreme Court: Using a Stolen Social Security Number is Not Identity Theft Jeffrey Walton (Nov 18)
- Re: Colorado Supreme Court: Using a Stolen Social Security Number is Not Identity Theft Rich Kulawiec (Nov 22)
- Re: Colorado Supreme Court: Using a Stolen Social Security Number is Not Identity Theft Jeffrey Walton (Nov 22)
- Re: Colorado Supreme Court: Using a Stolen Social Security Number is Not Identity Theft der Mouse (Nov 22)
- Re: Colorado Supreme Court: Using a Stolen Social Security Number is Not Identity Theft Jeffrey Walton (Nov 17)
- Re: Colorado Supreme Court: Using a Stolen Social Security Number is Not Identity Theft Tomas L. Byrnes (Nov 17)
- Re: Colorado Supreme Court: Using a Stolen Social Security Number is Not Identity Theft Jeffrey Walton (Nov 17)
- Re: Colorado Supreme Court: Using a Stolen Social Security Number is Not Identity Theft Dan Kaminsky (Nov 17)
- Re: Colorado Supreme Court: Using a Stolen Social Security Number is Not Identity Theft Jeffrey Walton (Nov 17)
- Re: Colorado Supreme Court: Using a Stolen Social Security Number is Not Identity Theft Dan Kaminsky (Nov 17)
- Re: Colorado Supreme Court: Using a Stolen Social Security Number is Not Identity Theft Dan Kaminsky (Nov 17)
- Re: Colorado Supreme Court: Using a Stolen Social Security Number is Not Identity Theft Jeffrey Walton (Nov 17)
