Intrusion Detection Systems mailing list archives
Re: How about digital signed binaries?
From: Michael Meier <mm () Informatik TU-Cottbus DE>
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2000 10:43:10 +0200 (MET DST)
Archive: http://msgs.securepoint.com/ids FAQ: http://www.ticm.com/kb/faq/idsfaq.html IDS: http://www-rnks.informatik.tu-cottbus.de/~sobirey/ids.html HELP: Having problems... email questions to ids-owner () uow edu au NOTE: Remove this section from reply msgs otherwise the msg will bounce. SPAM: DO NOT send unsolicted mail to this list. UNSUBSCRIBE: email "unsubscribe ids" to majordomo () uow edu au ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Vini,
From: Vinmcius da Silveira Serafim <serafim () inf ufrgs br>
I'm a Master on Computer Science student at UFRGS-BR, and I must develop until the end of the present year an individual work. So I've been thinking on a server that just executes signed binaries, and I want hear you about that...
check "TrustedBox: a Kernel-Level Integrity Checker", http://www.acsac.org/1999/abstracts/thu-a-1030-iglio.html I think the authors discusses a similar idea. Michael
Current thread:
- RE: How about digital signed binaries? Andreas Haug (Aug 03)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: How about digital signed binaries? Michael Meier (Aug 03)
