Intrusion Detection Systems mailing list archives
RE: RE: Info needed to compare Axent ITA and ISS RealSecure
From: gshipley () neohapsis com (Greg Shipley)
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2000 19:23:18 -0500 (CDT)
Archive: http://msgs.securepoint.com/ids FAQ: http://www.ticm.com/kb/faq/idsfaq.html IDS: http://www-rnks.informatik.tu-cottbus.de/~sobirey/ids.html UNSUBSCRIBE: email "unsubscribe ids" to majordomo () uow edu au On Wed, 5 Jul 2000, Chad Harrington wrote:
Axent's predecessor, Raxco, was formerly Clyde Digital, which came out with Audit for VMS (host-based IDS) in the late '70's / early 80's. The person who wrote it, Rob Clyde is still at Axent. The Audit product later became Intruder Alert. Axent's Intruder Alert, which holds 75% of the world-wide host-based IDS market share (IDC numbers, not ours), has been around since the early '90's. This is all documented in Rebecca Gurley Bace's recent book, Intrusion Detection. I think those who have commented are thinking of NETWORK-based IDS, not both types of IDS. As was noted, the NetProwler product originally came from an acquisition; we do not claim to be the first in the network-based market, but are very pleased with the 3.5 NetProwler network-based offering.
Ok, this helps clear it up - thank you. I (for one) wasn't aware of Axent's history, and, well, heck - now we know! Do you know if IDC has made those number public, or where I/we could find them?
I was purposefully vague, as I did not want to get in to a feature war. The
review by Network Computing is outdated, and doesn't talk at all about the
3.5 release of both our network and host IDS products, which introduced
major changes and enhancements. A more current review is from Secure
Computing Magazine, which gave the "Prowler IDS 3.5 (Intruder Alert &
NetProwler) the top rating - 5 Stars.
The review notes:
*snip* Agreed - the NWC review (I wrote it) was done almost 10 months ago. I would love to look at v3.5 of the product for the next round of review(s). A couple of questions: - While everyone always jumps all over my butt about not asking about other TCP/session/stream problems NIDS face, this is usually a good acid test: Does NetProwler v3.5 do frag re-assembly? - Did Axent finally weave NetProwler and ITA together via something other then SNMP traps? I've got a billion others, but those are two I'd love to know (as I'm sure others would like to know as well).
A question for all:
Why do people often think "IDS == Network-based IDS?"
I don't think they necessarily do. My ignorance can be attributed to a wide variety of problems *grin*, but in the realm of Axent's history and VMS products, well, the last time I used VMS was when I was Indiana (University) using campus e-mail. :) Some of us don't go back as far as others.:) A novice on many fronts, -Greg
Current thread:
- Re: RE: Info needed to compare Axent ITA and ISS RealSecure Donald McLachlan (Jul 04)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: RE: Info needed to compare Axent ITA and ISS RealSecure Chad Harrington (Jul 05)
- RE: RE: Info needed to compare Axent ITA and ISS RealSecure Greg Shipley (Jul 05)
- Re: RE: Info needed to compare Axent ITA and ISS RealSecure Greg Shipley (Jul 06)
