Intrusion Detection Systems mailing list archives
Source port of Samba Scans?
From: swan_daniel () my-deja com (Daniel Swan)
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 10:13:34 -0800
Looking at my logs, I see a lot of Samba scans... I think it's a fair assumption that Legion is being used in most cases. (If this is not a fair assumption, please let me know!). Sometimes the source port is something random, above 1024, which I assume is just a dynamically allocated port... but in other cases, it is 137. So how do we account for the two different cases here... is it different tools, different OS's... or what? --== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==-- Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
Current thread:
- Source port of Samba Scans? Daniel Swan (Mar 10)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Source port of Samba Scans? Robert Graham (Mar 10)
- Re: Source port of Samba Scans? Daniel Swan (Mar 10)
- Re: Source port of Samba Scans? Stuart Staniford-Chen (Mar 11)
- comparison of NFR vs RealSecure Thomas Nau (Mar 12)
- Re: comparison of NFR vs RealSecure Talisker (Mar 19)
- Good source of intrusion detection and response steps? Matt Baney (Mar 24)
- Re: Good source of intrusion detection and response steps? Stuart Staniford-Chen (Mar 24)
- Re: Good source of intrusion detection and response steps? Matt Baney (Mar 27)
- question tongchangda (Mar 19)
- Shomit Tap Documentation Jackie Chan (Mar 21)
