Security Incidents mailing list archives
Re: Who's liable?
From: Kelly Martin <kmartin () pyrzqxgl org>
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2001 21:59:33 -0500
On Sun, Oct 14, 2001 at 09:32:11PM -0400, Dom Genzano wrote:
In most cases, someone would be required to have a conviction to pursue damages- if they try to sue without a conviction you can sue them right back for defamation of character.
This is so glaringly false that it has to be debunked. The absence of a criminal conviction, or indeed of a criminal prosecution, is no bar whatsoever, and in fact not even very closely related, to tortious liability, especially for liability in negligence. Most forms of negligence are not criminal; not even all intentional torts are criminal. In most, but not all, states, it is true that a criminal conviction automatically leads to civil liability; but the converse is not the case. The question as to whether your negligence as a sysadmin resulting in your system being used as a platform for attacking someone else's system can be the basis of civil liability for negligence is, as far as I know, not been litigated. Based on what I remember from my torts class, I would tend to believe that it is possible. A professional in so field has a duty to perform those professional duties consistent with the "minimal standards of the profession". Failure to do so would amount to a breach of duty, and could give rise to liability in negligence. IMO, it won't be long before a jury decides that the failure to use an adequate firewall, or the failure to apply software patches in a timely fashion, or some other such thing amounts to professional negligence and can be the basis of liability. As an aside, it is virtually impossible to prosecute a suit for defamation in the United States. Truth is an absolute defense, and even the ultimate falseness of the alleged defamation is not sufficient to create liability. Kelly ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- This list is provided by the SecurityFocus ARIS analyzer service. For more information on this free incident handling, management and tracking system please see: http://aris.securityfocus.com
Current thread:
- Who's liable? Michael F. Bell (Oct 13)
- Re: Who's liable? hvdkooij (Oct 13)
- Re: Who's liable? macdaddy (Oct 14)
- RE: Who's liable? Dom Genzano (Oct 14)
- Re: Who's liable? Kelly Martin (Oct 14)
- Re: Who's liable? macdaddy (Oct 14)
- Re: Who's liable? hvdkooij (Oct 13)
- Re: Who's liable? Jay D. Dyson (Oct 13)
- Re: Who's liable? - fbi Alvin Oga (Oct 13)
- Re: Who's liable? Alvin Oga (Oct 13)
- RE: Who's liable? Chris Mason (Oct 13)
- RE: Who's liable? Liam Burrow (Oct 13)
- RE: Who's liable? Russell Berry (Oct 13)
- RE: Who's liable? Brian Taylor (Oct 14)
- Re: Who's liable? Frank (Oct 14)
- RE: Who's liable? Michael Conlen (Oct 14)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Who's liable? Rob Keown (Oct 13)
