Security Incidents mailing list archives
Re: Scans for SSHd via RIPE netblocks, anyone?
From: daniel uriah clemens <dclemens () inline com>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 11:42:02 -0500 (CDT)
SecurityFocus hinted that they where looking for information concerning the SSH CRC-32 Compensation Attack Detector Vulnerability released on feb 8, earlier this year. They then updated their database for the following entry.
snip from securityfocus>
Successful exploitation of this vulnerability is extremely dependent on attacker knowledge of the target process memory layout. This makes 'one-shot' exploitation difficult. With repeated attempts and the widespread use of binary ssh packages, exploitation of this vulnerability 'in the wild' is not inconcievable. There have been reports suggesting that this may be occuring. Since early september, independent, reliable sources have confirmed that this vulnerability is being exploited by attackers on the Internet. Security Focus does not currently have the exploit code being used, however this record will be updated if and when it becomes available. NOTE: Cisco 11000 Content Service Switch family is vulnerable to this issue. All WebNS releases prior, but excluding, versions: 4.01 B42s, 4.10 22s, 5.0 B11s, 5.01 B6s, are vulnerable.
unsnip>
bugtraq id 2347 object ssh, sshd class Boundary Condition Error cve CAN-2001-0144 remote Yes local No published Feb 08, 2001 updated Oct 19, 2001 Hope this helps. Simply, Daniel Uriah Clemens - dclemens () inline com "The right to freedom being the gift of God Almighty, it is not in the power of man to alienate this gift and voluntarily become a slave." --Samuel Adams On Sun, 21 Oct 2001, Jay D. Dyson wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hi folks,
No great shakes here, but I'm curious to know if anyone else is
seeing concerted SSHd scans coming from RIPE netblocks lately. I've noted
a few here and, while I considered them oddities at first, I'm starting to
wonder if someone (or something) across the Atlantic doesn't have the
much-ballyhoo'd "0day for sale."
I'm not bored enough to see what they're really up to (yet), so I
figured I'd just toss this out for general consideration.
Oh yeah, the latest scan came from 193.206.153.7.
- -Jay
( ( _______
)) )) .-"There's always time for a good cup of coffee."-. >====<--.
C|~~|C|~~| (>------ Jay D. Dyson - jdyson () treachery net ------<) | = |-'
`--' `--' `- Peace without justice is life without living. -' `------'
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: See http://www.treachery.net/~jdyson/ for current keys.
iQCVAwUBO9Jz97lDRyqRQ2a9AQHKbwP9EJcPFxXXWuPtOYRVYZmsIEPiomtwXDfu
xKTD01KsWH/dXGxs/h4kKd/QRzPGHnHreri59Sd9UBua+EV0VjzCzcR44Ne9k5ns
3FnP3TYrS1nVJ4q5cm4cawWNXRx3zo0loCbiYRT6Mbsp99y/Rju6Dy2OzA3VaYkH
kKz41A1aFKc=
=kGQe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is provided by the SecurityFocus ARIS analyzer service.
For more information on this free incident handling, management
and tracking system please see: http://aris.securityfocus.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------- This list is provided by the SecurityFocus ARIS analyzer service. For more information on this free incident handling, management and tracking system please see: http://aris.securityfocus.com
Current thread:
- Scans for SSHd via RIPE netblocks, anyone? Jay D. Dyson (Oct 22)
- Re: Scans for SSHd via RIPE netblocks, anyone? daniel uriah clemens (Oct 22)
- RE: Scans for SSHd via RIPE netblocks, anyone? Fernando Cardoso (Oct 22)
- RE: Scans for SSHd via RIPE netblocks, anyone? Sean Kelly (Oct 22)
- Re: Scans for SSHd via RIPE netblocks, anyone? Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 22)
- Odd probes from Cisco equipment... Mike (Oct 22)
- RE: Scans for SSHd via RIPE netblocks, anyone? Sean Kelly (Oct 22)
