Security Incidents mailing list archives
RE: Who's liable?
From: Rob Keown <Keown () MACDIRECT COM>
Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2001 20:19:44 -0400
Yes, the reason for my word culpable. This an open book, no? It is good to see we have people on this list that can help us chart an appropriate course for our organizations. Am I wrong in saying that the majority of good people here want to have an endpoint where people are held accountable for their hosts and networks? We just don't, at this point, want to prosecute an organization that is getting on the net with no real understanding of what such liability means. I have sent hundreds of messages to hosts infected by Nimda. I don't really want these people to feel as if they should shut their operations down because of criminal/civil liability. Conversely, if Nimda's payload was more destructive I might feel differently. These are all good commments and observations. Is there a better forum for this? I feel like we're treading on a line regarding this forum. Some of us have these messages sent to our pagers in the event there are valid and escalating intrusions. Rob Keown MAC DIRECT -----Original Message----- From: Jason Giglio [mailto:jgiglio () vt edu] Sent: Saturday, October 13, 2001 7:54 PM To: Rob Keown Subject: RE: Who's liable?
If the site from which the attack is launched is ignorant of any criminal activity then there is no *criminal* recourse. But let's also realize that
One thing you didn't make clear is that under the doctrine of respondent superior, an employee that is "on duty" who causes damages to someone else makes their employer responsible *civilly*. So even if there is no criminal recourse, the company could be sued successfully civilly. This makes a good argument if you are a consultant and you want to sell security services to small businesses who might otherwise just skip it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- This list is provided by the SecurityFocus ARIS analyzer service. For more information on this free incident handling, management and tracking system please see: http://aris.securityfocus.com
Current thread:
- RE: Who's liable?, (continued)
- RE: Who's liable? Rob Keown (Oct 13)
- Re: Who's liable? Kelly Martin (Oct 13)
- Re: Who's liable? Doug Foster (Oct 14)
- Re: Who's liable? Kelly Martin (Oct 14)
- RE: Who's liable? Shashi Dookhee (Oct 14)
- Re: Who's liable? HarryM (Oct 14)
- Re: Who's liable? macdaddy (Oct 14)
- Message not available
- Re: Who's liable? Jason Giglio (Oct 14)
- Re: Who's liable? Kelly Martin (Oct 13)
- RE: Who's liable? Rob Keown (Oct 13)
