Security Incidents mailing list archives
Re: Dameware scans, worm?
From: "Steven M. Christey" <coley () mitre org>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 19:50:02 -0500 (EST)
Regarding the varying source ports for the Dameware scans: Based on an *incomplete* and *quick* glance through two recently posted exploits for a Dameware vulnerability (CVE CAN-2003-1030): 1) both exploits use a reverse shell 2) both exploits take the "source port" on the command line So, the attacker can control which port is used. The exploits that I glanced at are: Bugtraq, January 10, 2004 DameWare Mini Remote Control < v3.73 remote exploit by kralor] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=bugtraq&m=107392603615840&w=2 Bugtraq, December 19, 2003 [Exploit]: DameWare Mini Remote Control Server Overflow Exploit http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=bugtraq&m=107187110617266&w=2 - Steve --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- Dameware scans, worm? Keith T. Morgan (Jan 22)
- Re: Dameware scans, worm? Charles Hamby (Jan 22)
- Re: Dameware scans, worm? Ben Nelson (Jan 22)
- Re: Dameware scans, worm? Chip Mefford (Jan 23)
- Re: Dameware scans, worm? KeyFocus (Jan 26)
- Re: Dameware scans, worm? Russell J. Lahti (Jan 23)
- Re: Dameware scans, worm? Chip Mefford (Jan 23)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Dameware scans, worm? Steven M. Christey (Jan 26)
