Security Incidents mailing list archives
RE: Incident investigation methodologies
From: "Dave Paris" <dparis () w3works com>
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 15:07:46 -0400
-----Original Message----- From: Steven Trewick [mailto:STrewick () joplings co uk] Sent: Monday, June 07, 2004 10:47 AM To: 'Harlan Carvey'; incidents () securityfocus com Cc: Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers Subject: RE: Incident investigation methodologies
[...]
If my choice as a human being was to perform a procedure on myself that would cost a minimal amount of resource, and take a minimal amount of time, or a lengthy and costly series of investigations that would take forever, be painful, and possibly, ultimately inconclusive, which would I pick ?
Depends. If you know you may well be dealing with a pathogen capable of inflicting near or at-lethal levels of damage on others (whether it's others you're in charge of or just other people), one would hope you'd have the professionalism and/or presence of mind to do a somewhat deeper inspection rather than just place a band-aid, smack it on the ass, and tell it to get back in the game. I think this can be summed (and lightened) up by invoking a little Monty Python. ...[Arthur chops off the Black Knight's left arm]... "Now stand aside, worthy adversary." "'Tis but a scratch." "A scratch? Your arm's off!" "Well, what's that, then?" "I've had worse." "You liar!" ...[Arthur chops off the Black Knight's right arm]... "Eh. You are indeed brave, Sir Knight, but the fight is mine." "Oh, had enough, eh?" "Look, you stupid bastard. You've got no arms left." "Yes, I have." "Look!" "Just a flesh wound." .. sorry, couldn't resist, given the "medical" twist ;-) Kind Regards, -dsp
-----Original Message----- From: Steven Trewick [mailto:STrewick () joplings co uk] Sent: Monday, June 07, 2004 10:47 AM To: 'Harlan Carvey'; incidents () securityfocus com Cc: Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers Subject: RE: Incident investigation methodologiesOne more thing to think about...what happens when you go to the doctor? When you go to a doctor's office with a complaint, does he simply give you a lethal injection then perform an autopsy to determine what was wrong with you? Or does he collect volatile information...interview you, ask you questions, take your temperature and blood pressure, etc?That is simply the single most bogus metaphor I've heard this week. In the real world, production systems need to go back into production ASAP. Frontline support staff simply do not have the time or resource (or often even the knowledge) to conduct lengthy forensic investigations. Time = Money, that's a cold, hard fact, and there simply isn't any way around it.
[...]
Current thread:
- Re: Incident investigation methodologies, (continued)
- Re: Incident investigation methodologies Harlan Carvey (Jun 04)
- Re: Incident investigation methodologies Maarten Van Horenbeeck (Jun 04)
- RE: Incident investigation methodologies Fiscus, Kevin (Jun 04)
- RE: Incident investigation methodologies Harlan Carvey (Jun 07)
- Re: Incident investigation methodologies Barry Fitzgerald (Jun 09)
- RE: Incident investigation methodologies Tim Hollebeek (Jun 10)
- Re: Incident investigation methodologies Harlan Carvey (Jun 14)
- RE: Incident investigation methodologies Harlan Carvey (Jun 07)
- RE: Incident investigation methodologies Gaydosh, Adam (Jun 04)
- RE: Incident investigation methodologies Steven Trewick (Jun 07)
- RE: Incident investigation methodologies Harlan Carvey (Jun 07)
- RE: Incident investigation methodologies Dave Paris (Jun 07)
- RE: Incident investigation methodologies Harlan Carvey (Jun 07)
- RE: Incident investigation methodologies Fiscus, Kevin (Jun 07)
- RE: Incident investigation methodologies pfft (Jun 13)
- RE: Incident investigation methodologies Harlan Carvey (Jun 14)
- RE: Incident investigation methodologies pfft (Jun 14)
- RE: Incident investigation methodologies Harlan Carvey (Jun 14)
- RE: Incident investigation methodologies pfft (Jun 13)
